Skip to content

Conversation

@guha-rahul
Copy link
Contributor

@guha-rahul guha-rahul commented Sep 16, 2025

tracks #32

Needs updated spec tests to pass

@guha-rahul guha-rahul marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2025 18:33
@guha-rahul guha-rahul changed the title feat: Add Progressive List Type feat(EIP: 7916): Add Progressive List and Progressive BitList Type Sep 30, 2025
const Node = @import("persistent_merkle_tree").Node;
const progressive = @import("progressive.zig");

pub fn ProgressiveBitList(comptime limit: comptime_int) type {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Progressive bitlist and progressive list have no limit.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ya mainly added the limit since the eip mentioned to enforce context specific bounds and there are networking limitations. It only checks if the limit is positive for now tho.

@guha-rahul guha-rahul changed the title feat(EIP: 7916): Add Progressive List and Progressive BitList Type feat(EIP: 7916, 7495, 8016): Add Progressive List, Progressive BitList, ProgressiveContainer, CompatibleUnion Oct 8, 2025
@guha-rahul guha-rahul marked this pull request as draft October 8, 2025 17:25
@guha-rahul guha-rahul marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2025 16:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants