Skip to content

Conversation

wemeetagain
Copy link
Member

  • Address Review project configuration file #43
  • Remove stray src/main.zig and src/root.zig (useless template files)
  • Rename the state-transition-utils library to state_transition_utils
  • Rename the root state_transition_utils source file to src/lib_state_transition_utils.zig
  • Remove some unused sections of zbuild.zon

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @wemeetagain, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on a significant cleanup and refactoring of the project's build configuration and source file structure. It addresses issue #43 by removing obsolete template files, standardizing naming conventions for the 'state-transition-utils' library, and streamlining the build process by removing unused definitions from 'build.zig' and 'zbuild.zon'.

Highlights

  • Project Structure Streamlining: Removed 'src/main.zig' and 'src/root.zig', which were identified as unused template files, simplifying the project's core structure.
  • Library Naming Standardization: Renamed the 'state-transition-utils' library to 'state_transition_utils' across the codebase, including its source file from 'src/root_c_abi.zig' to 'src/lib_state_transition_utils.zig', improving consistency with Zig's naming conventions.
  • Build Configuration Optimization: Updated 'build.zig' and 'zbuild.zon' to reflect the removed files and renamed library, eliminating unnecessary build steps and configurations.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request provides a good cleanup of the project's build configuration. It removes unused template files and their corresponding build logic, renames the main library and its source file for better clarity, and standardizes naming conventions in the build scripts. The changes are consistent and improve the project structure.

I've found one issue regarding the build manifest zbuild.zon. While cleaning up, a relevant comment was removed and the file's fingerprint was not updated after modification, which could lead to build issues. Please see the specific comment for details.

Copy link

Performance Report

✔️ no performance regression detected

Full benchmark results
Benchmark suite Current: ab86b44 Previous: null Ratio
JS - computeSyncCommitteeIndices - 16384 indices 331.98 ms/op
Zig - computeSyncCommitteeIndices - 16384 indices 4.0571 ms/op
JS - computeSyncCommitteeIndices - 250000 indices 317.21 ms/op
Zig - computeSyncCommitteeIndices - 250000 indices 17.459 ms/op
JS - computeSyncCommitteeIndices - 1000000 indices 334.79 ms/op
Zig - computeSyncCommitteeIndices - 1000000 indices 30.490 ms/op
get values - 1000 313.00 ns/op
get values - naive - 1000 490.00 ns/op
set values - 1000 317.00 ns/op
set values - naive - 1000 650.00 ns/op
get values - 1000000 863.00 ns/op
get values - naive - 1000000 2.1690 us/op
set values - 1000000 859.00 ns/op
set values - naive - 1000000 2.1110 us/op
JS - unshuffleList - 16384 indices 908.93 us/op
Zig - unshuffleList - 16384 indices 599.71 us/op
JS - unshuffleList - 250000 indices 13.701 ms/op
Zig - unshuffleList - 250000 indices 9.0367 ms/op
JS - unshuffleList - 1000000 indices 52.867 ms/op
Zig - unshuffleList - 1000000 indices 35.607 ms/op

by benchmarkbot/action

Copy link
Contributor

@ensi321 ensi321 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Way cleaner 👍

@wemeetagain wemeetagain merged commit b7c31ac into main Aug 22, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants