-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
Feature/modernizing #30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Switched to more DDD style configuration with a builder. Added Legacy helpers. Simplified Authentication with builders.
WalkthroughThis update enhances the Docker Registry project with significant improvements across multiple components. The GitHub Actions workflow has been optimized for better compatibility, while the .NET project now targets newer frameworks. New classes and interfaces for managing blobs, uploads, and authentication have been introduced, streamlining interactions with the Docker Registry. Overall, these changes boost functionality, maintainability, and adherence to modern coding practices. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 47
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (27)
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/ListTagsParameters.cs (1)
18-24
: Clarify the default behavior in documentation.The
Number
property documentation mentions a default behavior but does not specify what "all entries" means. Consider clarifying this in the comments.- /// Limit the number of entries in each response. Default is all entries. + /// Limit the number of entries in each response. Default is to return all available entries.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/MountParameters.cs (1)
18-19
: Ensure[DataMember]
Attributes for SerializationThe
MountParameters
class is marked with[DataContract]
, but its propertiesDigest
andFrom
are not marked with[DataMember]
. This may prevent them from being serialized. Please review and add[DataMember]
attributes if serialization is required for these properties.
Digest
From
Analysis chain
Ensure correct serialization with
[DataContract]
.The
[DataContract]
attribute is used for serialization. Ensure that all necessary properties are marked with[DataMember]
if required for serialization.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if `MountParameters` properties are correctly marked for serialization. # Test: Check for `[DataMember]` attributes. Expect: Presence of `[DataMember]` for each property. rg --type cs -A 3 $'public class MountParameters' | rg '\[DataMember\]'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if `MountParameters` properties are correctly marked for serialization. # Test: Check for `[DataMember]` attributes. Expect: Presence of `[DataMember]` for each property. rg --type cs -A 10 $'public class MountParameters' | rg 'public' -B 2 | rg '\[DataMember\]'Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all properties in the `MountParameters` class to verify if they need `[DataMember]` attributes. # Test: Extract all properties within the `MountParameters` class. rg --type cs -A 10 $'public class MountParameters' | rg 'public' -A 1Length of output: 484
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/ICatalogOperations.cs (1)
20-32
: Interface Update Approved with a Documentation SuggestionThe introduction of
ICatalogOperations
and theGetCatalog
method is a positive shift towards catalog management. The use of nullable parameters and a cancellation token is commendable.Consider enhancing the documentation comments for the parameters and return value to provide more detailed information.
- /// <param name="parameters"></param> - /// <param name="token"></param> - /// <returns></returns> + /// <param name="parameters">Optional parameters for catalog retrieval.</param> + /// <param name="token">Cancellation token for the operation.</param> + /// <returns>A task that represents the asynchronous operation, containing the catalog response.</returns>src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/MountResponse.cs (1)
31-32
: Correct the typo in theCreated
property documentation.There is a typo in the comment: "flse" should be "false". Additionally, consider rephrasing for clarity.
- /// If the blob is successfully mounted Created is true,Otherwise, it is flse + /// If the blob is successfully mounted, `Created` is true. Otherwise, it is false.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/RepositoryOperations.cs (1)
21-39
: Add error handling for HTTP requests inListRepositoryTags
method.The
ListRepositoryTags
method currently lacks proper error handling around theclient.MakeRequest
call. Consider adding try-catch blocks to handle exceptions such as network failures or deserialization errors to prevent runtime issues.
- File:
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/RepositoryOperations.cs
Analysis chain
Ensure proper error handling for HTTP requests.
The
ListRepositoryTags
method makes an HTTP request usingclient.MakeRequest
. Ensure that exceptions such as network failures or deserialization errors are handled appropriately to prevent runtime issues.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling for HTTP requests in ListRepositoryTags method. # Test: Search for try-catch blocks or error handling around client.MakeRequest calls. rg --type csharp -A 5 $'client.MakeRequest'Length of output: 10937
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for error handling around client.MakeRequest in RepositoryOperations.cs # Search for try-catch blocks or error handling in RepositoryOperations.cs rg --type csharp -A 10 -B 5 'client.MakeRequest' src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/RepositoryOperations.csLength of output: 630
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/SystemOperations.cs (1)
36-38
: Consider implementing error handling in thePing
method.The
Ping
method currently lacks error handling for potential exceptions that might arise from theclient.MakeRequest
call. Adding try-catch blocks or using a common error handling utility could improve the robustness of this method.
- File:
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/SystemOperations.cs
- Line: 36-38
Analysis chain
Consider adding error handling for HTTP requests.
The
Ping
method makes an HTTP request usingclient.MakeRequest
. Consider adding error handling to manage potential exceptions from network issues or unexpected responses.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling for HTTP requests in Ping method. # Test: Search for try-catch blocks or error handling around client.MakeRequest calls. rg --type csharp -A 5 $'client.MakeRequest'Length of output: 10937
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Registry/UnauthorizedApiException.cs (1)
37-42
: Consider extending exception message details.The
UnauthorizedApiException
class currently does not provide additional context or message details. Consider including more information in the exception message to aid in debugging unauthorized access issues.- internal UnauthorizedApiException(RegistryApiResponse response) - : base(response) + internal UnauthorizedApiException(RegistryApiResponse response) + : base($"Unauthorized API access. Status code: {response.StatusCode}")src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/AnonymousOAuthAuthenticationProvider.cs (2)
20-21
: Consider adding XML documentation comments.Adding XML documentation comments to the class and its methods would improve maintainability and provide clarity on the purpose and usage of the
AnonymousOAuthAuthenticationProvider
./// <summary> /// Provides OAuth authentication for anonymous access. /// </summary>
27-30
: Clarify the purpose ofAuthenticate
method.The
Authenticate
method currently does nothing. If this is intentional, consider adding a comment to explain its purpose or future implementation plans.// This method is intentionally left blank for now.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/IBlobOperations.cs (4)
20-21
: Consider adding XML documentation comments.Adding XML documentation comments to the interface and its methods would improve maintainability and provide clarity on the purpose and usage of
IBlobOperations
./// <summary> /// Defines operations for managing blobs in the Docker registry. /// </summary>
24-34
: Ensure detailed parameter descriptions.The parameters for
GetBlob
lack descriptions. Providing detailed descriptions would enhance understanding and usability./// <param name="name">The name of the repository.</param> /// <param name="digest">The digest of the blob.</param> /// <param name="token">A cancellation token.</param>
36-47
: Ensure detailed parameter descriptions.The parameters for
DeleteBlob
lack descriptions. Providing detailed descriptions would enhance understanding and usability./// <param name="name">The name of the repository.</param> /// <param name="digest">The digest of the blob to delete.</param> /// <param name="token">A cancellation token.</param>
49-59
: Ensure detailed parameter descriptions.The parameters for
BlobExists
lack descriptions. Providing detailed descriptions would enhance understanding and usability./// <param name="name">The name of the repository.</param> /// <param name="digest">The digest of the blob to check.</param> /// <param name="token">A cancellation token.</param>test/Docker.Registry.DotNet.Tests/Authentication/AuthenticateParserTests.cs (2)
24-25
: Consider adding XML documentation comments.Adding XML documentation comments to the test class would improve maintainability and provide clarity on the purpose and scope of the tests.
/// <summary> /// Tests for the AuthenticateParser class. /// </summary>
27-42
: Ensure test case descriptions are clear.The test cases are well-defined, but consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each test case for better readability.
// Test case with unquoted values // Test case with quoted values // Test case with mixed quoted and unquoted valuessrc/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/AuthenticationProvider.cs (2)
28-28
: Clarify method documentation.The
Authenticate(HttpRequestMessage request)
method lacks detailed documentation. Consider specifying what authentication steps should be implemented by subclasses./// <summary> /// Called on the initial send to apply authentication to the request. /// Implement this method to add authentication headers or tokens. /// </summary>
37-40
: Clarify method documentation.The
Authenticate(HttpRequestMessage request, HttpResponseMessage response, IRegistryUriBuilder builder)
method lacks detailed documentation. Specify the purpose of each parameter and the expected behavior when a send is challenged./// <summary> /// Called when the send is challenged. Implement this method to handle authentication challenges, /// such as adding or refreshing tokens. /// </summary> /// <param name="request">The HTTP request message.</param> /// <param name="response">The HTTP response message containing the challenge.</param> /// <param name="builder">The URI builder for constructing request URIs.</param>src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/DockerHubJwtAuthenticationProvider.cs (1)
32-59
: Consider adding logging for failed authentication.Adding logging for failed authentication attempts can improve debugging and monitoring.
// Example logging addition if (!response.IsSuccessStatusCode) { // Log the error Console.Error.WriteLine($"Authentication failed: {response.StatusCode} - {await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsyncWithCancellation(token)}"); throw new UnauthorizedAccessException( $"Unable to authenticate: {await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsyncWithCancellation(token)}"); }src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/IBlobUploadOperations.cs (1)
24-38
: Add a summary description forUploadBlob
.The method lacks a summary description, which would improve its readability and understanding.
+ /// <summary> + /// Uploads a blob to the specified repository. + /// </summary>src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/ManifestOperations.cs (8)
33-77
: Add a summary description forGetManifest
.The method lacks a summary description, which would improve its readability and understanding.
+ /// <summary> + /// Retrieves the manifest for the specified image reference. + /// </summary>
79-110
: Add a summary description forPutManifest
.The method lacks a summary description, which would improve its readability and understanding.
+ /// <summary> + /// Uploads a manifest to the specified repository. + /// </summary>
112-120
: Add a summary description forDeleteManifest
.The method lacks a summary description, which would improve its readability and understanding.
+ /// <summary> + /// Deletes the manifest for the specified image reference. + /// </summary>
122-131
: Add a summary description forGetManifestRaw
.The method lacks a summary description, which would improve its readability and understanding.
+ /// <summary> + /// Retrieves the raw manifest data for the specified image reference. + /// </summary>
133-143
: Add a summary description forGetDigest
.The method lacks a summary description, which would improve its readability and understanding.
+ /// <summary> + /// Retrieves the digest for the specified image tag. + /// </summary>
145-156
: Add a summary description forMakeManifestRequest
.The method lacks a summary description, which would improve its readability and understanding.
+ /// <summary> + /// Makes an HTTP request to retrieve the manifest for the specified image reference. + /// </summary>
158-176
: Add a summary description forGetContentType
.The method lacks a summary description, which would improve its readability and understanding.
+ /// <summary> + /// Determines the content type of the manifest based on the provided headers and manifest data. + /// </summary>
178-188
: Add a summary description forSchemaCheck
.The class lacks a summary description, which would improve its readability and understanding.
+ /// <summary> + /// Helper class for deserializing schema information from a manifest. + /// </summary>
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (95)
- .github/workflows/publish.yml (2 hunks)
- Docker.Registry.DotNet.sln (2 hunks)
- Docker.Registry.DotNet.sln.DotSettings (2 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- samples/Docker.Registry.Cli/Docker.Registry.Cli.csproj (1 hunks)
- samples/Docker.Registry.Cli/Program.cs (1 hunks)
- samples/DockerRegistryExplorer/ViewModel/RepositoryViewModel.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/AnonymousOAuthAuthenticationProvider.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/AuthenticateParser.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/AuthenticationProvider.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/BasicAuthenticationProvider.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/DockerHubJwtAuthenticationProvider.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/ParsedAuthentication.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/PasswordOAuthAuthenticationProvider.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/BlobOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/BlobUploadOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/CatalogOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/ManifestOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/RepositoryOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/SystemOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/TagOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/OAuth/OAuthClient.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/OAuth/OAuthToken.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/QueryStrings/QueryString.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/QueryStrings/QueryStringExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Registry/RegistryClient.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Registry/RegistryUriBuilder.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Docker.Registry.DotNet.csproj (2 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Blobs/BlobHeader.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Blobs/BlobUploadStatus.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Blobs/GetBlobResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Catalogs/CatalogParameters.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Catalogs/CatalogResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/DockerRegistryConstants.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/IBlobOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/IBlobUploadOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/ICatalogOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/IManifestOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/IRepositoryOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/ISystemOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/ITagOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/ManifestSchemaVersionNotSupportedException.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/UnknownManifestContentTypeException.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/ImageReferences/ImageDigest.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/ImageReferences/ImageReference.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/ImageReferences/ImageTag.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/GetImageManifestResult.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ImageManifest.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ImageManifest2_1.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ImageManifest2_2.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/Manifest.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ManifestFsLayer.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ManifestHistory.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ManifestLayer.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ManifestList.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ManifestMediaTypes.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ManifestSignature.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ManifestSignatureHeader.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/CompletedUploadResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/Config.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/InitiateMonolithicUploadResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/ListTagsParameters.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/ListTagsResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/MountParameters.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/MountResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/Platform.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/PushManifestResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/ResumableUpload.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/QueryParameters/QueryParameterAttribute.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/QueryStrings/IReadOnlyQueryString.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Registry/IRegistryClient.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Registry/IRegistryUriBuilder.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Registry/RegistryApiException.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Registry/RegistryApiResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Registry/RegistryConnectionException.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Registry/UnauthorizedApiException.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Repository/ListRepositoryTagsResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Repository/RepositoryTag.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Repository/RepositoryTagImage.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Repository/RepositoryTagsParameters.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/GlobalUsings.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/CharHelpers.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/CollectionExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/DictionaryExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/EnumerableExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/HttpContentHelper.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/HttpUtility.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/StringExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Json/JsonSerializer.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientConfiguration.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientConfigurationExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientLegacyHelpers.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Docker.Registry.DotNet.Tests/Authentication/AuthenticateParserTests.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Docker.Registry.DotNet.Tests/Docker.Registry.DotNet.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/Docker.Registry.DotNet.Tests/ImageReferenceTests.cs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Blobs/GetBlobResponse.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/DockerRegistryConstants.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/GetImageManifestResult.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ManifestMediaTypes.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/QueryStrings/IReadOnlyQueryString.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/GlobalUsings.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/CharHelpers.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/CollectionExtensions.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/DictionaryExtensions.cs
Additional context used
GitHub Check: build (8.x)
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Repository/RepositoryTagImage.cs
[warning] 8-8:
Non-nullable property 'Architecture' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider declaring the property as nullable.
[warning] 11-11:
Non-nullable property 'Features' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider declaring the property as nullable.
[warning] 14-14:
Non-nullable property 'Variant' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider declaring the property as nullable.
[warning] 17-17:
Non-nullable property 'Digest' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider declaring the property as nullable.
[warning] 20-20:
Non-nullable property 'Os' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider declaring the property as nullable.
[warning] 23-23:
Non-nullable property 'OsFeatures' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider declaring the property as nullable.
[warning] 26-26:
Non-nullable property 'OsVersion' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider declaring the property as nullable.
[warning] 32-32:
Non-nullable property 'Status' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider declaring the property as nullable.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Repository/RepositoryTag.cs
[warning] 14-14:
Non-nullable property 'Images' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider declaring the property as nullable.
[warning] 24-24:
Non-nullable property 'LastUpdaterUsername' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider declaring the property as nullable.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Json/JsonSerializer.cs
[warning] 41-41:
Possible null reference return.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/HttpUtility.cs
[warning] 56-56:
Possible null reference return.
[warning] 71-71:
Nullability of reference types in value of type 'string?[]' doesn't match target type 'string[]'.
[warning] 115-115:
Possible null reference return.
Additional comments not posted (161)
samples/Docker.Registry.Cli/Docker.Registry.Cli.csproj (1)
5-5
: Upgrade to .NET 8.0 approved.The update to target .NET 8.0 is a positive step towards leveraging the latest features and improvements. Ensure that all dependencies and libraries are compatible with .NET 8.0 to avoid runtime issues.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Repository/RepositoryTagsParameters.cs (1)
3-16
: Implementation ofRepositoryTagsParameters
looks good.The class is well-structured for handling pagination parameters with sensible defaults and appropriate query parameter mapping.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/UnknownManifestContentTypeException.cs (1)
18-18
: Good use of modern C# features.The use of a concise record-like class declaration for the exception is a good practice in modern C#.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/ManifestSchemaVersionNotSupportedException.cs (1)
18-18
: Good use of modern C# features.The use of a concise record-like class declaration for the exception is a good practice in modern C#.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/ISystemOperations.cs (1)
18-23
: Clear interface design with appropriate use of attributes.The interface
ISystemOperations
is well-defined with a single methodPing
, and the use of thePublicAPI
attribute indicates its intended external use.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ManifestFsLayer.cs (1)
1-23
: LGTM!The class
ManifestFsLayer
is well-defined for serialization with a nullable string propertyBlobSum
. The use ofDataContract
andDataMember
attributes is appropriate.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ManifestSignatureHeader.cs (1)
1-23
: LGTM!The class
ManifestSignatureHeader
is well-defined for serialization with a nullable string propertyAlg
. The use ofDataContract
andDataMember
attributes is appropriate.test/Docker.Registry.DotNet.Tests/Docker.Registry.DotNet.Tests.csproj (3)
4-7
: Upgrade to .NET 8.0 and enable modern features.The project now targets .NET 8.0, with nullable reference types and implicit usings enabled. This aligns with contemporary .NET development practices.
12-13
: Switch to NUnit and update test SDK.The transition from xUnit to NUnit and the update of
Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk
to version17.10.0
are strategic changes that modernize the testing framework.
15-18
: Update coverlet.collector for enhanced code coverage.The
coverlet.collector
package is updated to version6.0.2
, with additional attributes to control asset inclusion, improving code coverage analysis.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ManifestHistory.cs (2)
16-16
: Namespace update approved.The namespace change to
Docker.Registry.DotNet.Domain.Manifests
aligns with a more organized domain structure.
22-22
: Consider potential null handling forV1Compatibility
.The change to make
V1Compatibility
nullable is appropriate if there are scenarios where this property might not have a value. Ensure that any code interacting with this property handles null values correctly.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/QueryParameters/QueryParameterAttribute.cs (1)
19-21
: Implementation ofQueryParameterAttribute
looks good.The attribute is well-defined for use on properties with a key. Ensure consistent usage throughout the codebase.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Catalogs/CatalogResponse.cs (1)
21-22
:CatalogResponse
class implementation is solid.The use of
IReadOnlyCollection<string>
forRepositories
is a good choice for immutability. Ensure consistent usage throughout the codebase.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/EnumerableExtensions.cs (1)
20-22
: Good addition of theIfNullEmpty
method.This method enhances the robustness of handling null enumerables by returning an empty array, which is a common and useful pattern.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/InitiateMonolithicUploadResponse.cs (1)
18-24
: TheInitiateMonolithicUploadResponse
class is well-defined.The properties
Location
,ContentLength
, andDockerUploadUuid
are suitable for capturing response details. The use of nullable types is appropriate for optional fields.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ImageManifest.cs (1)
24-25
: The addition ofSchemaVersion
enhances theImageManifest
class.This property allows the class to specify the schema version, which is important for compatibility and validation.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Blobs/BlobHeader.cs (2)
21-23
: Constructor design is sound.The constructor enforces immutability by assigning the
dockerContentDigest
parameter to a read-only property. This aligns with best practices for encapsulation and immutability.
18-24
: Ensure proper use of the[PublicAPI]
attribute.The
[PublicAPI]
attribute suggests this class is intended for public use. Ensure that this aligns with the overall design and documentation.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/ListTagsParameters.cs (1)
23-24
: Use ofQueryParameter
attribute is appropriate.The
QueryParameter
attribute is correctly used to map theNumber
property to a query parameter. Ensure that this attribute is correctly handled in the query construction logic.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/ParsedAuthentication.cs (2)
18-24
: Constructor and property design promotes immutability.The constructor initializes all properties, which are read-only, ensuring immutability. This design is beneficial for thread safety and predictability.
18-18
: Consider the implications of internal access.The
ParsedAuthentication
class is marked as internal, which limits its visibility. Ensure this aligns with the intended usage and access patterns within the application.Verification successful
Internal access of
ParsedAuthentication
is appropriate.The
ParsedAuthentication
class is used internally within theAuthenticateParser
class, which aligns with its internal access modifier. This suggests the class is intended for internal operations only. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and access patterns of the `ParsedAuthentication` class. # Test: Search for the `ParsedAuthentication` class usage. Expect: Proper usage within the assembly. rg --type csharp -A 5 'ParsedAuthentication'Length of output: 1745
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/ITagOperations.cs (2)
21-24
: Ensure parameter validation inListTags
.The
ListTags
method accepts astring name
and optionalListTagsParameters
. Ensure that input validation is performed to prevent potential issues with invalid or null values.Verification successful
Input validation for
ListTags
method is present. TheListTags
method inTagOperations.cs
includes a check forstring.IsNullOrEmpty(name)
, ensuring that thename
parameter is validated.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify input validation for `ListTags` method. # Test: Search for `ListTags` method implementations. Expect: Presence of input validation logic. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern $'public class $_ { $$$ public ListTagResponseModel ListTags(string name, $_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 475
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Refine search for `ListTags` method implementations and check for input validation. # Search for any implementation of the `ListTags` method in C# files. rg --context 5 'ListTags\s*\(' --type csLength of output: 6287
18-19
: Clarify the purpose of[PublicAPI]
.The
[PublicAPI]
attribute suggests that this interface is intended for public use. Ensure that the attribute is correctly applied and documented if it has specific implications.Verification successful
Clarification on
[PublicAPI]
Attribute:The
[PublicAPI]
attribute is part of theJetBrains.Annotations
package, which is used to annotate public-facing APIs for better code analysis and documentation. It is correctly applied to theITagOperations
interface to indicate its intended public use. No further action is required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and documentation of `[PublicAPI]`. # Test: Search for `[PublicAPI]` usage and documentation. Expect: Consistent usage and documentation across the codebase. rg --type cs '\[PublicAPI\]'Length of output: 2638
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of the `[PublicAPI]` attribute to understand its purpose. rg --type cs 'class PublicAPI' -A 10 rg --type cs 'interface PublicAPI' -A 10 rg --type cs 'struct PublicAPI' -A 10Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for 'using' directives that might include the `[PublicAPI]` attribute. rg --type cs '^using ' -A 1 # Search for package references in project files that might include the `[PublicAPI]` attribute. rg '<PackageReference' -A 2Length of output: 24355
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ManifestSignature.cs (1)
18-19
: Review serialization attributes.The
[DataContract]
and[DataMember]
attributes are used for serialization. Ensure that all necessary properties are included and correctly handled during serialization.Verification successful
Serialization attributes are correctly applied.
The
ManifestSignature
class has[DataMember]
attributes for all its properties, ensuring proper serialization. The propertiesHeader
,Signature
, andProtected
are all marked with[DataMember]
. No further action is needed.
ManifestSignature
class properties:
Header
Signature
Protected
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify serialization attributes in `ManifestSignature`. # Test: Check for `[DataMember]` attributes. Expect: Presence of `[DataMember]` for each property. rg --type cs -A 3 $'public class ManifestSignature' | rg '\[DataMember\]'Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify serialization attributes in `ManifestSignature`. # Test: Check for `[DataMember]` attributes for each property in `ManifestSignature`. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern $'public class ManifestSignature { $$$ $_ $_ { get; set; } $$$ }' | rg '\[DataMember\]'Length of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all properties in the `ManifestSignature` class to verify serialization attributes. # Find the `ManifestSignature` class definition and list all properties. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern $'public class ManifestSignature { $$$ $_ $_ { get; set; } $$$ }'Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the entire `ManifestSignature` class definition and its contents. # Find the `ManifestSignature` class and display its contents. rg --type cs -A 20 'public class ManifestSignature'Length of output: 1523
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/OAuth/OAuthToken.cs (1)
18-31
: LGTM! TheOAuthToken
class is well-structured for serialization.The use of
[DataContract]
and[DataMember]
attributes is appropriate for serialization. The nullable strings for tokens handle potential null values gracefully.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/IRepositoryOperations.cs (1)
24-30
: LGTM! TheIRepositoryOperations
interface is well-defined.The interface design follows best practices for asynchronous programming with
Task
. The use of optional parameters andCancellationToken
is commendable.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Blobs/BlobUploadStatus.cs (1)
18-30
: LGTM!The addition of the
[PublicAPI]
attribute and the new propertiesRange
andDockerUploadUuid
enhance the class's functionality and documentation. These changes are well-structured and improve the class's usability..github/workflows/publish.yml (1)
Line range hint
14-41
:
CI/CD Improvements Approved!The updates to the action versions and the enhancements in the publish step improve the workflow's compatibility and robustness. These changes align with best practices for maintaining a reliable CI/CD pipeline.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/PushManifestResponse.cs (1)
1-34
: LGTM!The
PushManifestResponse
class is a well-structured data model for handling responses related to pushing manifests. The use of nullable strings is appropriate for optional fields. The file is correctly licensed under the Apache License.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Catalogs/CatalogParameters.cs (1)
1-34
: LGTM!The
CatalogParameters
class is well-designed for encapsulating catalog query parameters. The use of nullable integers and query parameter attributes is appropriate. TheEmpty
static property is a useful addition for default instances. The file is correctly licensed under the Apache License.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Registry/RegistryConnectionException.cs (1)
18-38
: Well-structured exception class.The
RegistryConnectionException
class is well-implemented with appropriate constructors and clear XML documentation. This enhances error handling related to registry connections.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/StringExtensions.cs (1)
18-34
: Useful string extension methods.The
StringExtensions
class provides valuable utilities for string manipulation. The methods are well-implemented and enhance the functionality of theInfrastructure.Helpers
namespace.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/CompletedUploadResponse.cs (1)
18-31
: Enhanced upload response class.The addition of
Location
andDockerContentDigest
properties to theCompletedUploadResponse
class provides valuable information about the upload process. The XML documentation is well-written and informative.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/MountResponse.cs (2)
23-23
: Nullable type usage forLocation
is appropriate.The change to make
Location
a nullable type is a good practice, allowing for better handling of cases where the location might not be set.
28-28
: Addition ofDockerUploadUuid
is well-implemented.The new property
DockerUploadUuid
is a useful addition, providing necessary information about the upload UUID. The documentation is clear and concise.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/HttpContentHelper.cs (2)
20-29
: Implementation ofReadAsStringAsyncWithCancellation
is correct.The method uses conditional compilation to handle different .NET versions, which is a good practice for maintaining compatibility.
31-40
: Implementation ofReadAsStreamAsyncWithCancellation
is correct.The method effectively uses conditional compilation to support different .NET versions, ensuring broad compatibility.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/ResumableUpload.cs (3)
26-26
: Nullable type usage forLocation
is appropriate.The
Location
property is correctly implemented as a nullable type, allowing for cases where the location might not be set.
31-31
: Nullable type usage forRange
is appropriate.The
Range
property is correctly implemented as a nullable type, and the documentation provides clear guidance on its use.
36-36
: Addition ofDockerUploadUuid
is well-implemented.The
DockerUploadUuid
property is a useful addition, providing necessary information about the upload UUID. The documentation is clear and concise.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/ListTagsResponse.cs (4)
20-28
: Ensure consistent usage of nullable reference types.The
Name
property is nullable, but theTags
property is not. Consider whetherTags
should also be nullable for consistency, especially if it can be null in some scenarios.
30-33
: LGTM!The use of records and the static
Empty
property are well-implemented.
35-35
: LGTM!The
DigestTagModel
record is simple and effective.
37-40
: LGTM!The
ListTagByDigestResponseModel
record is well-structured and consistent with the rest of the code.Docker.Registry.DotNet.sln.DotSettings (2)
Line range hint
2-14
: LGTM!The dynamic retrieval of the current year is a smart enhancement for maintaining accurate copyright information.
16-16
: LGTM!The addition of the settings migration entry is appropriate for managing code cleanup features.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/BasicAuthenticationProvider.cs (3)
21-21
: LGTM!The static
Schema
property is a good design choice for consistency.
23-26
: Verify the necessity of the placeholder method.The
Authenticate(HttpRequestMessage request)
method currently does nothing. Ensure it is necessary to keep this method as a placeholder.
28-43
: LGTM!The method correctly implements basic authentication by encoding credentials. Ensure that sensitive information is handled securely in the broader application context.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Registry/RegistryUriBuilder.cs (1)
20-45
: Ensure correct handling of relative paths inBuild
.The method correctly handles absolute URIs and appends paths and queries. Ensure that relative paths are intended to be appended directly to the base URI without validation or transformation.
Verification successful
Relative paths are correctly handled in
RegistryUriBuilder.Build
.The method is used with relative paths in several parts of the codebase, such as in
DockerHubJwtAuthenticationProvider
, confirming that the logic for handling relative paths is consistent with its intended use.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/DockerHubJwtAuthenticationProvider.cs
: UsesBuild("/v2/users/login")
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `RegistryUriBuilder.Build` to ensure relative paths are handled correctly. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Proper handling of relative paths. rg --type cs -A 5 $'RegistryUriBuilder.Build'Length of output: 44
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for instantiations of `RegistryUriBuilder` and calls to its `Build` method in the codebase. # Find where `RegistryUriBuilder` is instantiated or used. rg --type cs 'RegistryUriBuilder' -A 10 # Specifically search for calls to the `Build` method. rg --type cs '\.Build\(' -A 5Length of output: 15728
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/QueryStrings/QueryStringExtensions.cs (2)
37-40
: EnsureQueryString
supports adding non-empty parameters.The method assumes
QueryString
has anAdd
method. Verify that this method exists and behaves as expected.
26-30
: EnsureQueryString
supports adding parameters.The method assumes
QueryString
has anAdd
method. Verify that this method exists and behaves as expected.Verification successful
Verification Successful:
QueryString.Add
Method Exists and Supports Adding ParametersThe
QueryString
class has multipleAdd
method overloads that handle various types of values, confirming that theAddIfNotNull
extension method can utilize these methods as intended. No issues found with the current implementation.
QueryString.cs
contains theAdd
method definitions.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and behavior of `QueryString.Add` method. # Test: Search for the `Add` method in `QueryString`. Expect: Method definition and correct usage. rg --type cs -A 5 $'QueryString.Add'Length of output: 993
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of the `Add` method in `QueryString`. # Test: Locate the definition of `Add` method in C# files. rg --type cs -A 5 'Add('Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of the `Add` method in `QueryString`. # Test: Locate the definition of `Add` method in C# files using a corrected regex pattern. rg --type cs -A 5 'Add\('Length of output: 7666
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ManifestList.cs (1)
1-37
: File Approved:ManifestList
ClassThe
ManifestList
class is well-structured and follows .NET conventions. The use of nullable types forMediaType
andManifests
is appropriate, and the documentation is clear and informative.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ImageManifest2_2.cs (1)
1-41
: File Approved:ImageManifest2_2
ClassThe
ImageManifest2_2
class is well-organized and adheres to .NET conventions. The use of nullable properties is appropriate, and the documentation effectively explains the purpose of each property.test/Docker.Registry.DotNet.Tests/Authentication/AuthenticateParserTests.cs (1)
49-53
: Good use of Fluent Assertions.The use of Fluent Assertions enhances readability and expressiveness of the test assertions.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Registry/RegistryApiException.cs (1)
48-56
: Consider extending exception information.The
RegistryApiException<TBody>
class adds the response body to the exception. This is useful for debugging. Ensure that sensitive information is not exposed in the body.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Models/Config.cs (1)
35-35
: Ensure size constraints are met.The
Size
property represents the size in bytes. Ensure that any logic using this property correctly handles large values and potential overflows.Verification successful
No issues found with
Size
property handling. The searches did not reveal any arithmetic operations or type conversions involving theSize
property that could lead to overflow or data loss. It appears that the handling of theSize
property is straightforward and does not involve operations that would cause such issues.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `Size` property is handled correctly in the codebase. # Test: Search for usage of the `Size` property. Expect: Proper handling of large values. rg --type csharp 'Size' -A 5Length of output: 3776
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for arithmetic operations involving the `Size` property to check for potential overflow handling. rg --type csharp '\bSize\b\s*[\+\-\*/%]=' -A 5 # Search for any conversions of the `Size` property to other types that might lead to data loss. rg --type csharp 'Size\s*=\s*\(.*\)' -A 5Length of output: 92
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ManifestLayer.cs (2)
18-51
: Well-structured Data Contract for Manifest Layer.The
ManifestLayer
class is well-structured and uses data annotations effectively for serialization. The XML comments provide clear documentation for each property, enhancing maintainability and readability.
1-14
: Ensure License Compliance.The file includes a standard Apache 2.0 license header. Verify that the licensing terms are correctly applied across the project.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/CatalogOperations.cs (2)
1-31
: Ensure License Compliance.The file includes a standard Apache 2.0 license header. Verify that the licensing terms are correctly applied across the project.
37-56
: Efficient Implementation of Catalog Operations.The
CatalogOperations
class efficiently implements theICatalogOperations
interface. The use of the builder pattern for query parameters is a modern approach that enhances code readability and maintainability. The methodGetCatalog
is well-structured and handles HTTP requests asynchronously.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Registry/IRegistryUriBuilder.cs (2)
1-15
: Ensure License Compliance.The file includes a standard Apache 2.0 license header. Verify that the licensing terms are correctly applied across the project.
49-62
: Interface and Extension for URI Building.The
IRegistryUriBuilder
interface and its extension method provide a flexible way to construct URIs, which is crucial for interacting with the Docker Registry. The use of an extension method to handle query strings is a clean and effective approach.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/Manifest.cs (1)
1-53
: LGTM!The
Manifest
class is well-structured and documented. The use of nullable reference types andDataMember
attributes is appropriate for serialization. No issues found.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Manifests/ImageManifest2_1.cs (1)
1-60
: LGTM!The
ImageManifest2_1
class is well-structured and documented. The use of nullable reference types andDataMember
attributes is appropriate for serialization. No issues found.samples/DockerRegistryExplorer/ViewModel/RepositoryViewModel.cs (1)
69-71
: LGTM!The update to use
ListTags
withListTagsParameters
aligns with the PR objectives of modernizing the codebase. The method logic remains efficient and maintains existing functionality.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Registry/IRegistryClient.cs (6)
39-43
: LGTM! Manifest operations are well-defined.The
Manifest
property is appropriately documented and marked for public API usage.
45-49
: LGTM! Catalog operations are well-defined.The
Catalog
property is appropriately documented and marked for public API usage.
51-55
: LGTM! Blob operations are well-defined.The
Blobs
property is appropriately documented and marked for public API usage.
57-61
: LGTM! Blob upload operations are well-defined.The
BlobUploads
property is appropriately documented and marked for public API usage.
63-67
: LGTM! Tag operations are well-defined.The
Tags
property is appropriately documented and marked for public API usage.
69-73
: LGTM! System operations are well-defined.The
System
property is appropriately documented and marked for public API usage.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/ImageReferences/ImageReference.cs (7)
20-23
: LGTM! Constructor for ImageTag is well-implemented.The constructor correctly handles null values and initializes the
ImageReference
.
25-28
: LGTM! Constructor for ImageDigest is well-implemented.The constructor correctly handles null values and initializes the
ImageReference
.
38-41
: LGTM! ImageReference creation from ImageTag is straightforward.The
Create
method is correctly implemented and follows .NET conventions.
43-46
: LGTM! ImageReference creation from ImageDigest is straightforward.The
Create
method is correctly implemented and follows .NET conventions.
48-51
: LGTM! ImageReference creation from string is well-implemented.The method correctly attempts to create an
ImageReference
by parsing the string as either anImageDigest
or anImageTag
.
53-69
: LGTM! TryCreate method is well-implemented.The method correctly attempts to create an
ImageReference
and uses out parameters effectively.
71-77
: LGTM! ToString method is well-implemented.The method provides a clear string representation of the
ImageReference
.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/ImageReferences/ImageDigest.cs (5)
22-32
: LGTM! Constructor for ImageDigest is well-implemented.The constructor correctly validates and normalizes the input string.
43-46
: LGTM! ImageDigest creation is straightforward.The
Create
method is correctly implemented and follows .NET conventions.
48-61
: LGTM! TryCreate method is well-implemented.The method correctly attempts to create an
ImageDigest
and uses out parameters effectively.
68-83
: LGTM! IsValidDigest method is well-implemented.The method provides a clear and effective validation logic for digest strings.
85-85
: LGTM! ToString method is well-implemented.The method provides a clear string representation of the
ImageDigest
.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/QueryStrings/QueryString.cs (3)
26-35
: LGTM: Efficient query string construction.The
GetQueryString
method efficiently constructs a query string using LINQ and appropriate URI encoding.
37-40
: LGTM: Correct handling of null values.The method correctly handles null values by defaulting to an empty string.
42-45
: LGTM: Appropriate handling of object values.The method correctly converts object values to strings and handles nulls appropriately.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Docker.Registry.DotNet.csproj (8)
3-3
: LGTM: Updated target frameworks.The update to include newer .NET versions enhances compatibility and access to modern features.
6-6
: LGTM: Enabled nullable reference types.This change promotes safer code by reducing the likelihood of null reference errors.
7-7
: LGTM: Enabled implicit usings.This change reduces boilerplate code and simplifies project setup.
12-12
: LGTM: Updated project version.Incrementing the version number to 1.3.0 accurately reflects the new features and enhancements introduced.
34-34
: LGTM: UpdatedMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub
package.Updating to version 8.0.0 ensures compatibility with the latest source linking features.
35-38
: LGTM: AddedPolySharp
package.The addition of
PolySharp
introduces new functionality that aligns with the project's modernization efforts.
39-39
: LGTM: UpdatedJetBrains.Annotations
package.Updating to version 2024.2.0 ensures compatibility with the latest annotations features.
46-46
: LGTM: UpdatedSystem.Buffers
package.Updating to version 4.5.1 ensures compatibility with the latest buffers features.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/DockerHubJwtAuthenticationProvider.cs (2)
20-25
: LGTM: Efficient use ofHttpClient
.The static
HttpClient
is correctly initialized, which is a best practice for performance.
61-74
: LGTM: Secure handling of authentication token.The method securely handles the authentication token and correctly sets the authorization header.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/BlobOperations.cs (3)
38-51
: LGTM!The
GetBlob
method correctly fetches the blob and constructs aGetBlobResponse
. Ensure that error handling inMakeRequestForStreamedResponseAsync
is robust.
53-62
: LGTM!The
DeleteBlob
method correctly sends a delete request. Ensure that error handling inMakeRequest
is robust.
64-80
: LGTM!The
BlobExists
method correctly checks for the blob's existence using the status code. Ensure that error handling inMakeRequestNotErrorAsync
is robust.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientConfigurationExtensions.cs (4)
20-31
: LGTM!The
UseBasicAuthentication
method correctly sets up basic authentication. The null check forconfiguration
is a good practice.
33-44
: LGTM!The
UsePasswordOAuthAuthentication
method correctly sets up password OAuth authentication. The null check forconfiguration
is a good practice.
54-65
: LGTM!The
UseDockerHubAuthentication
method correctly sets up Docker Hub authentication. The null check forconfiguration
is a good practice.
73-81
: LGTM!The
UseAnonymousOAuthAuthentication
method correctly sets up anonymous OAuth authentication. The null check forconfiguration
is a good practice.test/Docker.Registry.DotNet.Tests/ImageReferenceTests.cs (7)
27-38
: LGTM!The
ImageReferenceWithDigestShouldWork
test correctly verifies the creation ofImageReference
with valid digests. The assertions are appropriate.
40-49
: LGTM!The
ImageReferenceWithInvalidDigestShouldFail
test correctly verifies that an invalid digest throws anArgumentException
. The exception message assertion is appropriate.
51-63
: LGTM!The
ImageReferenceWithTagShouldWork
test correctly verifies the creation ofImageReference
with a valid tag. The assertions are appropriate.
65-71
: LGTM!The
TagEmptyShouldFail
test correctly verifies that an empty tag throws anArgumentException
. The exception message assertion is appropriate.
73-79
: LGTM!The
TagTooLargeShouldFail
test correctly verifies that an excessively large tag throws anArgumentException
. The exception message assertion is appropriate.
81-87
: LGTM!The
TagWithInvalidCharactersShouldFail
test correctly verifies that a tag with invalid characters throws anArgumentException
. The exception message assertion is appropriate.
89-95
: LGTM!The
TagWithInvalidStartShouldFail
test correctly verifies that a tag starting with an invalid character throws anArgumentException
. The exception message assertion is appropriate.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/TagOperations.cs (1)
23-50
: Verify error handling and logging inclient.MakeRequest
.Ensure that the
MakeRequest
method inRegistryClient
properly handles HTTP errors and logs necessary information for debugging.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/IManifestOperations.cs (1)
64-64
: Verify the impact of removingDoesManifestExistAsync
.Ensure that the removal of
DoesManifestExistAsync
does not break existing functionality or dependencies.Verification successful
No impact from the removal of
DoesManifestExistAsync
.The method
DoesManifestExistAsync
is not found in the codebase, indicating that its removal does not affect existing functionality or dependencies.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the `DoesManifestExistAsync` method. # Test: Search for the usage of `DoesManifestExistAsync`. Expect: No critical dependencies. rg --type csharp 'DoesManifestExistAsync'Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition and usage of `DoesManifestExistAsync` in the codebase. # Search for the definition of `DoesManifestExistAsync`. rg --type csharp 'DoesManifestExistAsync' # Search for any usage of `DoesManifestExistAsync` across the codebase. rg 'DoesManifestExistAsync'Length of output: 69
Docker.Registry.DotNet.sln (1)
22-22
: Verify the impact of the project identifier change.The project identifier for
DockerRegistryExplorer
has been updated. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended project structure and does not affect any build or reference dependencies.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/OAuth/OAuthClient.cs (1)
83-107
: LGTM! Ensure proper usage ofGetToken
methods.The
GetToken
methods provide overloaded functionality for token retrieval. Ensure they are used correctly throughout the codebase.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/AuthenticateParser.cs (1)
20-23
: Ensure correctness of theParse
method.The
Parse
method relies onSplitWWWAuthenticateHeader
. Verify that it correctly handles various WWW-Authenticate header formats.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/HttpUtility.cs (2)
78-85
: LGTM!The method correctly adds headers to the
HttpRequestHeaders
object.
87-94
: LGTM!The method correctly retrieves an authentication header by schema.
samples/Docker.Registry.Cli/Program.cs (2)
Line range hint
9-105
:
LGTM!The program logic is consistent with the new namespace imports and maintains its functionality.
7-7
: Verify the impact of namespace import changes.Ensure that the added import aligns with the program's functionality and that removed imports are no longer necessary.
Verification successful
Namespace import changes verified.
The new namespace
Docker.Registry.DotNet.Domain.Registry
is actively used, confirming its necessity. The removed namespaces are still in use in other parts of the codebase, indicating their removal fromProgram.cs
is appropriate. No issues found with the import changes in the context ofProgram.cs
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new and removed namespaces. # Test: Search for usage of the new namespace. Expect: Relevant usage of the new namespace. rg --type cs 'using Docker.Registry.DotNet.Domain.Registry' # Test: Search for usage of removed namespaces. Expect: No usage of the removed namespaces. rg --type cs 'using Docker.Registry.DotNet.Authentication' rg --type cs 'using Docker.Registry.DotNet.Models'Length of output: 1197
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientConfiguration.cs (7)
32-40
: LGTM!The constructor is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives.
42-44
: LGTM!The parameterless constructor is appropriate for scenarios where default values are acceptable.
90-95
: LGTM!The method correctly sets the default timeout.
97-102
: LGTM!The method correctly sets the HTTP message handler.
107-115
: LGTM!The method is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives.
117-121
: LGTM!The method correctly validates the configuration.
123-127
: LGTM!The method ensures that the configuration is validated before client creation.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Endpoints/IBlobUploadOperations.cs (7)
40-51
: LGTM!The method
MountBlob
is well-documented and clear.
53-65
: LGTM!The method
GetBlobUploadStatus
is well-documented and clear.
67-82
: LGTM!The method
UploadBlobChunk
is well-documented and clear.
84-101
: LGTM!The method
CompleteBlobUpload
is well-documented and clear.
103-115
: LGTM!The method
CancelBlobUpload
is well-documented and clear.
117-125
: LGTM!The method
StartUploadBlob
is well-documented and clear.
127-139
: LGTM!The method
MonolithicUploadBlob
is well-documented and clear.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientLegacyHelpers.cs (16)
25-33
: LGTM!The method
PingAsync
is well-structured and clear.
35-45
: LGTM!The method
IsExistBlobAsync
is well-structured and clear.
47-57
: LGTM!The method
DeleteBlobAsync
is well-structured and clear.
59-69
: LGTM!The method
GetBlobAsync
is well-structured and clear.
71-80
: LGTM!The method
GetCatalogAsync
is well-structured and clear.
82-92
: LGTM!The method
GetManifestAsync
is well-structured and clear.
94-104
: LGTM!The method
DeleteManifestAsync
is well-structured and clear.
106-117
: LGTM!The method
PutManifestAsync
is well-structured and clear.
119-128
: LGTM!The method
GetManifestRawAsync
is well-structured and clear.
131-141
: LGTM!The method
ListImageTagsAsync
is well-structured and clear.
143-157
: LGTM!The method
MonolithicUploadBlobAsync
is well-structured and clear.
160-177
: LGTM!The method
UploadBlobAsync
is well-structured and clear.
179-189
: LGTM!The method
MountBlobAsync
is well-structured and clear.
191-203
: LGTM!The method
UploadBlobChunkAsync
is well-structured and clear.
205-223
: LGTM!The method
CompleteBlobUploadAsync
is well-structured and clear.
238-247
: LGTM!The method
StartUploadBlobAsync
is well-structured and clear.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/BlobUploadOperations.cs (5)
78-93
: Verify header handling and test coverage for GetBlobUploadStatus.Ensure that the headers
Docker-Upload-UUID
andRange
are consistently available in the response. Additionally, confirm that this method is covered by unit tests.Would you like me to generate unit tests for this method or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
95-124
: Verify header handling and test coverage for UploadBlobChunk.Ensure that the headers
Docker-Upload-UUID
,location
, andRange
are consistently available in the response. Additionally, confirm that this method is covered by unit tests.Would you like me to generate unit tests for this method or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
126-160
: Verify header handling and test coverage for CompleteBlobUpload.Ensure that the headers
Docker-Content-Digest
andlocation
are consistently available in the response. Additionally, confirm that this method is covered by unit tests.Would you like me to generate unit tests for this method or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
181-249
: Verify exception handling, retry logic, and test coverage for UploadBlob.Ensure that the exception handling and retry logic are robust and that the method is covered by unit tests. Pay special attention to the retry mechanism for authentication.
Would you like me to generate unit tests for this method or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
24-40
: Verify header handling and test coverage.Ensure that the headers, especially
Docker-Upload-UUID
,location
, andRange
, are consistently available in the response. Additionally, verify that this method is covered by unit tests.Would you like me to generate unit tests for this method or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Registry/RegistryClient.cs (5)
45-67
: LGTM! Ensure correct dependency injection.The constructor is well-structured and follows best practices. All dependencies appear to be correctly injected and utilized.
93-96
: LGTM! Resource cleanup is handled correctly.The
Dispose
method follows best practices for resource cleanup.
185-234
: Verify retry logic and test coverage for InternalMakeRequestAsync.Ensure that the retry logic is robust and that the method is covered by unit tests. Pay special attention to the authentication retry mechanism.
Would you like me to generate unit tests for this method or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
157-183
: Verify error handling and test coverage for MakeRequestForStreamedResponseAsync.Ensure that the error handling is robust and that the method is covered by unit tests. Pay special attention to the handling of streamed responses.
Would you like me to generate unit tests for this method or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
98-126
: Verify error handling and test coverage for MakeRequest.Ensure that the error handling is robust and that the method is covered by unit tests. Pay special attention to the handling of unauthorized responses.
Would you like me to generate unit tests for this method or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
public string Next { get; set; } | ||
|
||
[JsonProperty("previous")] | ||
public object Previous { get; set; } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider specifying a type for Previous
.
The Previous
property is currently of type object
. If possible, specify a more concrete type to improve type safety and clarity.
README.md
Outdated
var configuration = new RegistryClientConfiguration("http://localhost:5000"); | ||
|
||
using (var client = configuration.CreateClient()) | ||
{ | ||
await client.System.PingAsync(); | ||
// get catalog | ||
var catalog = await await client.Catalog.GetCatalog(); | ||
|
||
// list tags for the first catalog | ||
var tags = await client.Tags.ListTags(catalog?.Repositories.FirstOrDefault()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with a minor suggestion!
The updated usage instructions improve clarity and functionality by demonstrating catalog retrieval and tag listing. The explicit URL format enhances understanding. However, the double await
in await await client.Catalog.GetCatalog();
seems redundant and should be corrected.
var catalog = await client.Catalog.GetCatalog();
public T DeserializeObject<T>(string json) | ||
{ | ||
return JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<T>(json, Settings); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handle Potential Null Reference in DeserializeObject
Method
The DeserializeObject
method can return null if the JSON string cannot be deserialized into the specified type. Consider handling the potential null return to prevent runtime exceptions.
public T? DeserializeObject<T>(string json)
{
return JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<T>(json, Settings);
}
Additionally, ensure that callers of this method handle the possibility of a null return.
Tools
GitHub Check: build (8.x)
[warning] 41-41:
Possible null reference return.
[DataContract] | ||
public class Platform | ||
{ | ||
/// <summary> | ||
/// The architecture field specifies the CPU architecture, for example amd64 or ppc64le | ||
/// </summary> | ||
[DataMember(Name = "architecture")] | ||
public string? Architecture { get; set; } | ||
|
||
/// <summary> | ||
/// The os field specifies the operating system, for example linux or windows. | ||
/// </summary> | ||
[DataMember(Name = "os")] | ||
public string? Os { get; set; } | ||
|
||
/// <summary> | ||
/// The optional os.version field specifies the operating system version, for example 10.0.10586. | ||
/// </summary> | ||
[DataMember(Name = "os.version")] | ||
public string? OsVersion { get; set; } | ||
|
||
/// <summary> | ||
/// The optional os.features field specifies an array of strings, each listing a required OS feature (for example on | ||
/// Windows win32k) | ||
/// </summary> | ||
[DataMember(Name = "os.features")] | ||
public string? OsFeatures { get; set; } | ||
|
||
/// <summary> | ||
/// The optional variant field specifies a variant of the CPU, for example armv6l to specify a particular CPU variant | ||
/// of the ARM CPU. | ||
/// </summary> | ||
[DataMember(Name = "variant")] | ||
public string? Variant { get; set; } | ||
|
||
/// <summary> | ||
/// The optional features field specifies an array of strings, each listing a required CPU feature (for example sse4 or | ||
/// aes). | ||
/// </summary> | ||
[DataMember(Name = "features")] | ||
public string[]? Features { get; set; } | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider using non-nullable reference types where applicable.
The properties Architecture
, Os
, OsVersion
, OsFeatures
, and Variant
are defined as nullable. If these properties are expected to always have values, consider using non-nullable reference types to enforce this at compile time. If they are genuinely optional, ensure that the rest of the codebase handles potential null values appropriately.
public override async Task Authenticate( | ||
HttpRequestMessage request, | ||
HttpResponseMessage response, | ||
IRegistryUriBuilder uriBuilder) | ||
{ | ||
var header = this.TryGetSchemaHeader(response, Schema); | ||
|
||
//Get the bearer bits | ||
var bearerBits = AuthenticateParser.ParseTyped(header.Parameter); | ||
|
||
string? scope = null; | ||
|
||
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(bearerBits.Scope)) | ||
//Also include the repository(plugin) resource type to be able to access plugin repositories. | ||
//See https://docs.docker.com/registry/spec/auth/scope/ | ||
scope = | ||
$"{bearerBits.Scope} {bearerBits.Scope?.Replace("repository:", "repository(plugin):")}"; | ||
|
||
//Get the token | ||
var token = await this._client.GetToken( | ||
bearerBits.Realm, | ||
bearerBits.Service, | ||
scope, | ||
username, | ||
password); | ||
|
||
//Set the header | ||
request.Headers.Authorization = | ||
new AuthenticationHeaderValue(Schema, token.AccessToken); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure proper error handling in async methods.
The Authenticate
method that performs the token retrieval and sets the authorization header does not currently handle exceptions that might occur during the token retrieval process. Consider adding error handling to manage potential issues with network requests or invalid responses.
try
{
var token = await this._client.GetToken(
bearerBits.Realm,
bearerBits.Service,
scope,
username,
password);
request.Headers.Authorization = new AuthenticationHeaderValue(Schema, token.AccessToken);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// Handle exceptions (e.g., log the error, retry logic, etc.)
throw new AuthenticationException("Failed to authenticate using OAuth.", ex);
}
public async Task<MountResponse> MountBlob( | ||
string name, | ||
MountParameters parameters, | ||
CancellationToken token = default) | ||
{ | ||
var queryString = new QueryString(); | ||
queryString.Add("mount", parameters.Digest); | ||
queryString.Add("from", parameters.From); | ||
|
||
var response = await client.MakeRequest( | ||
HttpMethod.Post, | ||
$"{client.RegistryVersion}/{name}/blobs/uploads/", | ||
queryString, | ||
token: token); | ||
|
||
return new MountResponse | ||
{ | ||
DockerUploadUuid = response.Headers.GetString("Docker-Upload-UUID"), | ||
Location = response.Headers.GetString("location"), | ||
Created = response.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.Created | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add unit tests for MountBlob method to ensure functionality and header handling.
The MountBlob
method accesses the Docker-Upload-UUID
and location
headers, which appear to be consistently used across the codebase. However, there is no evidence of specific unit tests for this method. It is recommended to add unit tests to verify its functionality and ensure that these headers are correctly handled.
- Consider creating unit tests for the
MountBlob
method inBlobUploadOperations.cs
.
Analysis chain
Verify header handling and test coverage for MountBlob.
Ensure that the headers Docker-Upload-UUID
and location
are consistently available in the response. Additionally, confirm that this method is covered by unit tests.
Would you like me to generate unit tests for this method or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence of required headers in the response and check test coverage for MountBlob.
# Test: Check for header usage. Expect: Headers are accessed consistently.
rg --type cs 'Headers.GetString\("Docker-Upload-UUID"\)' -A 2
# Test: Check for unit tests. Expect: At least one test for MountBlob.
rg --type cs 'MountBlob'
Length of output: 2624
[Obsolete("Use CancelBlobUpload() instead")] | ||
public static Task CompleteBlobUploadAsync( | ||
this IBlobUploadOperations operations, | ||
string name, | ||
string uuid, | ||
CancellationToken token = default) | ||
{ | ||
if (operations == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(operations)); | ||
|
||
return operations.CancelBlobUpload(name, uuid, token); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct the method name.
The method name CompleteBlobUploadAsync
is incorrect for the functionality it provides. It should be CancelBlobUploadAsync
.
- [Obsolete("Use CancelBlobUpload() instead")]
- public static Task CompleteBlobUploadAsync(
+ [Obsolete("Use CancelBlobUpload() instead")]
+ public static Task CancelBlobUploadAsync(
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
[Obsolete("Use CancelBlobUpload() instead")] | |
public static Task CompleteBlobUploadAsync( | |
this IBlobUploadOperations operations, | |
string name, | |
string uuid, | |
CancellationToken token = default) | |
{ | |
if (operations == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(operations)); | |
return operations.CancelBlobUpload(name, uuid, token); | |
} | |
[Obsolete("Use CancelBlobUpload() instead")] | |
public static Task CancelBlobUploadAsync( | |
this IBlobUploadOperations operations, | |
string name, | |
string uuid, | |
CancellationToken token = default) | |
{ | |
if (operations == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(operations)); | |
return operations.CancelBlobUpload(name, uuid, token); | |
} |
internal async Task<RegistryApiResponse<string>> MakeRequestNotErrorAsync( | ||
HttpMethod method, | ||
string path, | ||
IReadOnlyQueryString? queryString = null, | ||
IReadOnlyDictionary<string, string>? headers = null, | ||
Func<HttpContent>? content = null, | ||
CancellationToken token = default) | ||
{ | ||
using var response = await this.InternalMakeRequestAsync( | ||
this.DefaultTimeout, | ||
HttpCompletionOption.ResponseContentRead, | ||
method, | ||
path, | ||
queryString, | ||
headers, | ||
content, | ||
token); | ||
|
||
var responseBody = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsyncWithCancellation(token) | ||
.ConfigureAwait(false); | ||
|
||
var apiResponse = new RegistryApiResponse<string>( | ||
response.StatusCode, | ||
responseBody, | ||
response.Headers); | ||
|
||
return apiResponse; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure test coverage for MakeRequestNotErrorAsync.
This method performs a straightforward request without error handling. Verify that it is covered by unit tests to ensure its behavior is as expected.
Would you like me to generate unit tests for this method or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
internal void HandleIfErrorResponse(RegistryApiResponse<string> response) | ||
{ | ||
// If no customer handlers just default the response. | ||
foreach (var handler in this._errorHandlers) handler(response); | ||
|
||
// No custom handler was fired. Default the response for generic success/failures. | ||
if (response.StatusCode is < HttpStatusCode.OK or >= HttpStatusCode.BadRequest) | ||
throw new RegistryApiException<string>(response); | ||
} | ||
|
||
internal void HandleIfErrorResponse(RegistryApiResponse response) | ||
{ | ||
// If no customer handlers just default the response. | ||
foreach (var handler in this._errorHandlers) handler(response); | ||
|
||
// No custom handler was fired. Default the response for generic success/failures. | ||
if (response.StatusCode is < HttpStatusCode.OK or >= HttpStatusCode.BadRequest) | ||
throw new RegistryApiException(response); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure test coverage for HandleIfErrorResponse.
This method performs error handling for HTTP requests. Verify that it is covered by unit tests to ensure its behavior is as expected.
Would you like me to generate unit tests for this method or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Jaben, here are the unit tests for the HandleIfErrorResponse
method in the RegistryClient
class. These tests cover various scenarios to ensure the method behaves as expected:
using System;
using System.Net;
using Xunit;
public class RegistryClientTests
{
[Fact]
public void HandleIfErrorResponse_ShouldThrowUnauthorizedApiException_WhenStatusCodeIsUnauthorized()
{
// Arrange
var response = new RegistryApiResponse<string>(HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized, "", null);
var client = new RegistryClient(/* parameters */);
// Act & Assert
Assert.Throws<UnauthorizedApiException>(() => client.HandleIfErrorResponse(response));
}
[Fact]
public void HandleIfErrorResponse_ShouldThrowRegistryApiException_WhenStatusCodeIsBadRequest()
{
// Arrange
var response = new RegistryApiResponse<string>(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, "", null);
var client = new RegistryClient(/* parameters */);
// Act & Assert
Assert.Throws<RegistryApiException<string>>(() => client.HandleIfErrorResponse(response));
}
[Fact]
public void HandleIfErrorResponse_ShouldNotThrowException_WhenStatusCodeIsOK()
{
// Arrange
var response = new RegistryApiResponse<string>(HttpStatusCode.OK, "", null);
var client = new RegistryClient(/* parameters */);
// Act & Assert
var exception = Record.Exception(() => client.HandleIfErrorResponse(response));
Assert.Null(exception);
}
}
These tests simulate different HTTP status codes to verify that the HandleIfErrorResponse
method correctly handles unauthorized and bad request responses by throwing the appropriate exceptions. The test for the OK status ensures that no exception is thrown for successful responses. Adjust the parameters for RegistryClient
as needed to match your setup.
internal HttpRequestMessage PrepareRequest( | ||
HttpMethod method, | ||
Uri uri, | ||
IReadOnlyDictionary<string, string>? headers, | ||
Func<HttpContent>? content) | ||
{ | ||
var request = new HttpRequestMessage(method, uri); | ||
|
||
request.Headers.Add("User-Agent", DockerRegistryConstants.UserAgent); | ||
request.Headers.AddRange(headers); | ||
|
||
//Create the content | ||
request.Content = content?.Invoke(); | ||
|
||
return request; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure test coverage for PrepareRequest.
This method prepares an HTTP request with headers and content. Verify that it is covered by unit tests to ensure its behavior is as expected.
Would you like me to generate unit tests for this method or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Switched to using the ActivitySource to "log" stuff internally.
Actually pretty useful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
22-22
: Fix heading level increment.The heading level should increment by one level at a time. Change the heading from
###
to##
.- ### Local Hub + ## Local HubTools
Markdownlint
22-22: Expected: h2; Actual: h3
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (22)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/AnonymousOAuthAuthenticationProvider.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/AuthenticationProvider.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/BasicAuthenticationProvider.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/PasswordOAuthAuthenticationProvider.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/BlobUploadOperations.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/OAuth/OAuthClient.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Registry/RegistryClient.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Registry/RegistryUriBuilder.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Assembly.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Docker.Registry.DotNet.csproj (2 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Configuration/FrozenRegistryClientConfigurationImpl.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Configuration/IFrozenRegistryClientConfiguration.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/DockerRegistryConstants.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Repository/ListRepositoryTagsResponse.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Repository/RepositoryTag.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Repository/RepositoryTagImage.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/HttpUtility.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Json/JsonSerializer.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientConfiguration.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientConfigurationExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientLegacyHelpers.cs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Configuration/IFrozenRegistryClientConfiguration.cs
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (12)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/AnonymousOAuthAuthenticationProvider.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/AuthenticationProvider.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/BasicAuthenticationProvider.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Endpoints/BlobUploadOperations.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Registry/RegistryClient.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Registry/RegistryUriBuilder.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/DockerRegistryConstants.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Repository/RepositoryTag.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Repository/RepositoryTagImage.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Json/JsonSerializer.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientConfigurationExtensions.cs
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientLegacyHelpers.cs
Additional context used
GitHub Check: build (8.x)
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Repository/ListRepositoryTagsResponse.cs
[warning] 9-9:
Non-nullable property 'Next' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider declaring the property as nullable.
[warning] 12-12:
Non-nullable property 'Previous' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider declaring the property as nullable.
[warning] 15-15:
Non-nullable property 'Tags' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider declaring the property as nullable.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/Authentication/PasswordOAuthAuthenticationProvider.cs
[warning] 45-45:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'value' in 'ParsedAuthentication AuthenticateParser.ParseTyped(string value)'.
[warning] 65-65:
Dereference of a possibly null reference.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/OAuth/OAuthClient.cs
[warning] 61-61:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'value' in 'void Dictionary<string, string>.Add(string key, string value)'.
[warning] 62-62:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'value' in 'void Dictionary<string, string>.Add(string key, string value)'.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientConfiguration.cs
[warning] 28-28:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'baseAddress' in 'RegistryClientConfiguration RegistryClientConfiguration.SetBaseAddress(Uri baseAddress)'.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/HttpUtility.cs
[warning] 26-26:
Converting null literal or possible null value to non-nullable type.
Markdownlint
README.md
22-22: Expected: h2; Actual: h3
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
Additional comments not posted (21)
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Domain/Configuration/FrozenRegistryClientConfigurationImpl.cs (1)
18-23
: LGTM!The use of records and nullable types is consistent with modern C# practices.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Assembly.cs (1)
24-29
: LGTM!The introduction of
ActivitySource
enhances observability and aligns with modern practices.README.md (1)
32-32
: Remove redundantawait
.The double
await
inawait await client.Catalog.GetCatalog();
is unnecessary and should be corrected.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Docker.Registry.DotNet.csproj (3)
3-3
: Update target frameworks.The update to target modern .NET frameworks enhances compatibility and allows leveraging new features. Ensure all code is compatible with these frameworks.
6-7
: Enable nullable reference types and implicit usings.These settings promote safer code and reduce boilerplate. Ensure all code complies with nullable reference type requirements.
34-43
: Verify package dependency updates.Ensure that all updated packages are compatible with the new target frameworks and that no breaking changes affect the application.
src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Application/OAuth/OAuthClient.cs (2)
96-103
: LGTM!The method correctly delegates to
GetTokenInner
for token retrieval without authentication.
105-120
: LGTM!The method correctly delegates to
GetTokenInner
for token retrieval with authentication.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientConfiguration.cs (7)
34-42
: LGTM!The constructor correctly initializes the configuration with the provided parameters.
44-46
: LGTM!The parameterless constructor is suitable for use with the fluent interface methods.
70-83
: LGTM!The method includes necessary validation for the base address.
85-90
: LGTM!The method correctly updates the default timeout with validation.
92-97
: LGTM!The method allows setting a custom HTTP message handler.
102-109
: LGTM!The method provides flexibility in setting an authentication provider with a sensible default.
111-121
: LGTM!The method validates the base address and constructs a
RegistryClient
with the configuration.src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/HttpUtility.cs (6)
22-44
: LGTM!The method handles null and empty values for the path and query string correctly.
Tools
GitHub Check: build (8.x)
[warning] 26-26:
Converting null literal or possible null value to non-nullable type.
52-59
: LGTM!The method handles null values for the response and returns null if the header is not found.
67-75
: LGTM!The method correctly handles null values and returns an array of header values.
78-85
: LGTM!The method handles null values for the headers and adds them to the collection.
87-93
: LGTM!The method checks for null response and retrieves the header by schema.
96-107
: LGTM!The method handles null values for the headers and returns the content length if available.
public int Count { get; set; } | ||
|
||
[JsonProperty("next")] | ||
public string Next { get; set; } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider declaring properties as nullable or initialize them.
The properties Next
, Previous
, and Tags
are non-nullable but not initialized. To prevent nullability warnings, consider declaring them as nullable or initializing them in the constructor.
- public string Next { get; set; }
- public string Previous { get; set; }
- public List<RepositoryTag> Tags { get; set; }
+ public string? Next { get; set; }
+ public string? Previous { get; set; }
+ public List<RepositoryTag>? Tags { get; set; }
Also applies to: 12-12, 15-15
Tools
GitHub Check: build (8.x)
[warning] 9-9:
Non-nullable property 'Next' must contain a non-null value when exiting constructor. Consider declaring the property as nullable.
public override async Task Authenticate( | ||
HttpRequestMessage request, | ||
HttpResponseMessage response, | ||
IRegistryUriBuilder uriBuilder) | ||
{ | ||
using var activity = Assembly.Source.StartActivity("PasswordOAuthAuthenticationProvider.Authenticate(request, response)"); | ||
|
||
var header = this.TryGetSchemaHeader(response, Schema); | ||
|
||
//Get the bearer bits | ||
var bearerBits = AuthenticateParser.ParseTyped(header.Parameter); | ||
|
||
string? scope = null; | ||
|
||
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(bearerBits.Scope)) | ||
//Also include the repository(plugin) resource type to be able to access plugin repositories. | ||
//See https://docs.docker.com/registry/spec/auth/scope/ | ||
scope = | ||
$"{bearerBits.Scope} {bearerBits.Scope?.Replace("repository:", "repository(plugin):")}"; | ||
|
||
//Get the token | ||
var token = await this._client.GetToken( | ||
bearerBits.Realm, | ||
bearerBits.Service, | ||
scope, | ||
username, | ||
password); | ||
|
||
//Set the header | ||
request.Headers.Authorization = | ||
new AuthenticationHeaderValue(Schema, token.AccessToken); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add error handling for async operations.
The Authenticate
method should handle exceptions that might occur during token retrieval to prevent unhandled exceptions.
try
{
var token = await this._client.GetToken(
bearerBits.Realm,
bearerBits.Service,
scope,
username,
password);
request.Headers.Authorization = new AuthenticationHeaderValue(Schema, token.AccessToken);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// Handle exceptions (e.g., log the error, retry logic, etc.)
throw new AuthenticationException("Failed to authenticate using OAuth.", ex);
}
Tools
GitHub Check: build (8.x)
[warning] 45-45:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'value' in 'ParsedAuthentication AuthenticateParser.ParseTyped(string value)'.
[warning] 65-65:
Dereference of a possibly null reference.
var header = this.TryGetSchemaHeader(response, Schema); | ||
|
||
//Get the bearer bits | ||
var bearerBits = AuthenticateParser.ParseTyped(header.Parameter); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Check for null reference before parsing.
Ensure that header.Parameter
is not null before calling AuthenticateParser.ParseTyped
to avoid null reference exceptions.
if (header?.Parameter == null)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("Authentication header parameter is missing.");
}
var bearerBits = AuthenticateParser.ParseTyped(header.Parameter);
Tools
GitHub Check: build (8.x)
[warning] 45-45:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'value' in 'ParsedAuthentication AuthenticateParser.ParseTyped(string value)'.
|
||
//Set the header | ||
request.Headers.Authorization = | ||
new AuthenticationHeaderValue(Schema, token.AccessToken); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure non-null token before setting authorization header.
Check that token.AccessToken
is not null before setting the authorization header to prevent null reference issues.
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(token?.AccessToken))
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("Token is invalid or missing.");
}
request.Headers.Authorization = new AuthenticationHeaderValue(Schema, token.AccessToken);
Tools
GitHub Check: build (8.x)
[warning] 65-65:
Dereference of a possibly null reference.
private async Task<OAuthToken?> GetTokenInner( | ||
string realm, | ||
string? service, | ||
string? scope, | ||
string? username, | ||
string? password, | ||
CancellationToken token = default) | ||
{ | ||
using var activity = Assembly.Source.StartActivity("OAuthClient.GetTokenInner()"); | ||
|
||
HttpRequestMessage request; | ||
|
||
if (username == null || password == null) | ||
{ | ||
var queryString = new QueryString(); | ||
|
||
queryString.AddIfNotEmpty("service", service); | ||
queryString.AddIfNotEmpty("scope", scope); | ||
|
||
var builder = new UriBuilder(new Uri(realm)) | ||
{ | ||
Query = queryString.GetQueryString() | ||
}; | ||
|
||
request = new HttpRequestMessage(HttpMethod.Get, builder.Uri); | ||
} | ||
else | ||
{ | ||
request = new HttpRequestMessage(HttpMethod.Post, realm) | ||
{ | ||
Content = new FormUrlEncodedContent( | ||
new Dictionary<string, string> | ||
{ | ||
{ "client_id", "Docker.Registry.DotNet" }, | ||
{ "grant_type", "password" }, | ||
{ "username", username }, | ||
{ "password", password }, | ||
{ "service", service }, | ||
{ "scope", scope } | ||
} | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure non-null values in dictionary.
The service
and scope
parameters can be null, which would cause an exception when added to the dictionary. Consider using null-coalescing operators or conditional logic to handle null values.
{ "service", service ?? string.Empty },
{ "scope", scope ?? string.Empty }
Tools
GitHub Check: build (8.x)
[warning] 61-61:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'value' in 'void Dictionary<string, string>.Add(string key, string value)'.
[warning] 62-62:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'value' in 'void Dictionary<string, string>.Add(string key, string value)'.
public RegistryClientConfiguration(string baseAddress, TimeSpan defaultTimeout = default) | ||
{ | ||
/// <summary> | ||
/// Creates an instance of the RegistryClientConfiguration. | ||
/// </summary> | ||
/// <param name="host"></param> | ||
/// <param name="defaultTimeout"></param> | ||
public RegistryClientConfiguration(string host, TimeSpan defaultTimeout = default) | ||
: this(defaultTimeout) | ||
{ | ||
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(host)) | ||
throw new ArgumentException("Value cannot be null or whitespace.", nameof(host)); | ||
var isValidUri = Uri.TryCreate(baseAddress, UriKind.Absolute, out var parsedBaseAddress); | ||
|
||
this.Host = host; | ||
} | ||
if (isValidUri ) this.SetBaseAddress(parsedBaseAddress); | ||
else throw new ArgumentException("BaseAddress is not a valid Uri", nameof(baseAddress)); | ||
|
||
/// <summary> | ||
/// Creates an instance of the RegistryClientConfiguration. | ||
/// </summary> | ||
/// <param name="host"></param> | ||
/// <param name="httpMessageHandler"></param> | ||
/// <param name="defaultTimeout"></param> | ||
public RegistryClientConfiguration( | ||
string host, | ||
HttpMessageHandler httpMessageHandler, | ||
TimeSpan defaultTimeout = default) | ||
: this(defaultTimeout) | ||
{ | ||
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(host)) | ||
throw new ArgumentException("Value cannot be null or whitespace.", nameof(host)); | ||
this.SetDefaultTimeout(defaultTimeout); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handle potential null reference for baseAddress
.
Ensure that baseAddress
is not null before calling SetBaseAddress
. Consider adding a null check or using a nullable type.
- if (isValidUri ) this.SetBaseAddress(parsedBaseAddress);
+ if (isValidUri && parsedBaseAddress != null) this.SetBaseAddress(parsedBaseAddress);
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Tools
GitHub Check: build (8.x)
[warning] 28-28:
Possible null reference argument for parameter 'baseAddress' in 'RegistryClientConfiguration RegistryClientConfiguration.SetBaseAddress(Uri baseAddress)'.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/HttpUtility.cs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/Infrastructure/Helpers/HttpUtility.cs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- Docker.Registry.DotNet.sln (2 hunks)
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientConfiguration.cs (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Docker.Registry.DotNet.sln
- src/Docker.Registry.DotNet/RegistryClientConfiguration.cs
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
HttpUtility
class for improved URI handling and HTTP header management.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores