Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Balance "Audit the stats of various standard pants, making things a bit more logical when needed."
Purpose of change
A few things were nonsensical i.e. jeans and ripped jeans having the same warmth.
Also, to keep clothing stats up to date and consistent.
Describe the solution
Minor JSON fixes
ripped jeans warmth 10->8 (compare to 10 for jeans)
Vintage jeans back pockets max weight 4kb->5kb (compare to front pocket 5kg)
skinny jeans description -> updated to accurately reflect pocket number
Striped pants->
These should probably be removed since we have variants now, but as of now they are currently just lower encumbrance pants
in the mean time, mirrored stats from the regular pants
work pants->
Vintage jeans back pockets max weight 4kb->5kb (compare to pants 4kg)
front pockets -> 1250ml->1500ml
added two more small pockets (https://www.lowes.com/pd/Carhartt-Men-s-Carhartt-Brown-Duck-Work-Pants-32-x-34/5014529621)
3rd image here ^
utility knife pocket
hiking pants
side pocket access time 80->60
light survivor_pants
max contain weight of pockets from 1/2kg -> ~2/3kg
survivor_pants
max contain weight of pockets from 2/3kg -> ~3/4kg
mercenary pants
max contain weight 4kg->5kg
Describe alternatives you've considered
Not doing this?
Testing
TBD (still WIP on my own compiled build, been like 2 years since I last commited)
Additional context