feat: anthropic-plugin #1465
feat: anthropic-plugin #1465
Conversation
abhishekpatil4
requested review from
himanshu-dixit,
plxity and
utkarsh-dixit
as code owners
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
This comment was generated by github-actions[bot]! JS SDK Coverage Report📊 Coverage report for JS SDK can be found at the following URL: 📁 Test report folder can be found at the following URL: |
![entelligence-ai-pr-reviews[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/932812?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to fcec923 in 2 minutes and 34 seconds
More details
- Looked at
138lines of code in2files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/src/frameworks/anthropic.ts:74
- Draft comment:
Ensure toolSchema[0] exists before accessing its properties to avoid potential runtime errors. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
2. js/src/frameworks/anthropic.ts:35
- Draft comment:
Unused parameter 'entityId' in _wrapTool; consider removing or documenting its purpose. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
While the parameter is technically unused in the method body, it's being passed in from a public method. Removing it could break the public API contract or make the code less consistent with the rest of the codebase's patterns. Without seeing the parent class or understanding the full context of how entityId is used across the system, removing this parameter could be risky.
The comment points out a real issue - the parameter is unused. However, it might be used in a parent class implementation or might be part of a broader pattern in the codebase.
Given that this is a framework integration file and the parameter is consistently used throughout other methods, it's better to err on the side of caution and maintain consistency.
The comment should be deleted as it could lead to breaking changes without full context of the codebase's patterns and parent class implementation.
3. js/src/frameworks/anthropic.ts:80
- Draft comment:
JSON.parse on toolCall.arguments can throw on invalid JSON; consider adding error handling. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
4. js/src/index.ts:1
- Draft comment:
Ensure consistent import/export ordering per project style guidelines. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%
None
Workflow ID: wflow_le4uuT2pWsdKLuyU
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
Code Review SummaryOverall, the implementation of Anthropic SDK support is well-structured and follows the established patterns in the codebase. Here's a detailed assessment: Strengths:✅ Follows the existing framework integration patterns Areas for Improvement:
Code Quality Rating: 7/10The implementation is solid but could be improved with better type safety and error handling. The suggested changes would make the code more robust and maintainable. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 51538a5 in 1 minute and 45 seconds
More details
- Looked at
86lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/src/frameworks/anthropic.spec.ts:49
- Draft comment:
Using Object.keys on an array is non-standard; prefer using tools.length for consistency with other tests. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
2. js/src/frameworks/anthropic.spec.ts:53
- Draft comment:
Consider verifying the response of createAction before fetching tools to ensure the action is correctly registered. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment suggests adding an extra verification step, but the existing test already verifies the key outcome - that the action was successfully registered and can be retrieved. The comment is asking for additional checks that don't add meaningful value. It's the kind of "verify/ensure" comment that our rules specifically call out as not useful.
Perhaps there could be important error states or edge cases in the createAction response that should be tested separately.
While error cases could be tested, that would be a separate test case. This test is clearly focused on the happy path and already verifies the key outcome.
Delete this comment. It suggests additional verification that doesn't add value, and the existing test already covers the key functionality.
Workflow ID: wflow_IJkwGisRZuzjykwf
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on cf7ef46 in 54 seconds
More details
- Looked at
60lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
8drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/src/frameworks/anthropic.spec.ts:28
- Draft comment:
Good change: usingtools.lengthdirectly is clearer. Consider reviewing tests if the underlying implementation no longer returns an object. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%
None
2. js/src/frameworks/anthropic.ts:35
- Draft comment:
Nice improvement: providing an explicit type for 'schema' enhances type safety and clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%
None
3. js/src/frameworks/anthropic.ts:65
- Draft comment:
Removing the extra 'entityId' argument in _wrapTool is fine if it’s not used. Ensure its removal doesn’t affect expected behaviour. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%
None
4. js/src/frameworks/anthropic.ts:96
- Draft comment:
Explicitly typing the 'response' parameter in handleToolCall improves clarity. Confirm that the expected structure fully covers all cases. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%
None
5. js/src/frameworks/anthropic.spec.ts:28
- Draft comment:
Using 'tools.length' directly is more idiomatic for arrays compared to Object.keys(tools).length. Ensure that getTools() always returns an array. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%
None
6. js/src/frameworks/anthropic.ts:35
- Draft comment:
The _wrapTool function now uses an explicit type for the schema parameter and removes the unused 'entityId' parameter. This improves type safety and cleans up the API. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%
None
7. js/src/frameworks/anthropic.ts:65
- Draft comment:
The mapping in getTools() now omits the second parameter since _wrapTool no longer accepts an entityId. This streamlines the call; ensure that no functionality depended on the previous parameter. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%
None
8. js/src/frameworks/anthropic.ts:95
- Draft comment:
The handleToolCall function now has an explicit type for the 'response' parameter, enhancing type safety. This improves clarity of the expected input structure. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%
None
Workflow ID: wflow_0rSKanPlRJSEYZ2M
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 8c57267 in 25 seconds
More details
- Looked at
12lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/package.json:46
- Draft comment:
Confirm dependency version range for @anthropic-ai/sdk is intentional. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%
None
2. js/package.json:46
- Draft comment:
Added new dependency @anthropic-ai/sdk v^0.39.0. Ensure this version aligns with your plugin's requirements. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%
None
Workflow ID: wflow_23pfcAySAXyUSEmj
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
Important
Add
AnthropicToolSetfor Anthropic framework support with tool management and execution capabilities, including tests and SDK dependency.AnthropicToolSetclass inanthropic.tsfor managing and executing tools in the Anthropic framework.getTools,executeToolCall, andhandleToolCallinAnthropicToolSet.anthropic.spec.tsfor testingAnthropicToolSetfunctionalities, including tool retrieval and custom action execution.@anthropic-ai/sdktodependenciesinpackage.json.AnthropicToolSetinindex.ts.This description was created by
for 8c57267. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.