feat: Agents SDK documentation #1533
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Review SummarySkipped posting 3 drafted comments based on your review threshold. Feel free to update them here. Draft Commentsfern/frameworks/openai-agents.mdx:18-18Scores:
Reason for filtering: The comment addresses a minor syntax highlighting issue with code block language specification that has minimal production impact and low urgency. Analysis: This comment addresses incorrect code block language specification ( fern/frameworks/openai-agents.mdx:12-12Scores:
Reason for filtering: The issue is a minor documentation formatting error with minimal impact on functionality Analysis: This is a minor markdown formatting issue in documentation where a code block has an incorrect language tag. While the fix is very specific and clear, it has no impact on production functionality and very low urgency. The total score of 7 is well below the threshold of 14 required to keep the comment. fern/frameworks/openai-agents.mdx:40-42Scores:
Reason for filtering: The comment identifies a documentation inconsistency that could cause user confusion Analysis: The bug identifies a documentation error where GEMINI_API_KEY is mentioned but not used in the code. This could cause user confusion and failed implementations (production_impact: 3). The fix is very clear and directly applicable (fix_specificity: 5). The urgency is high as documentation errors directly impact user experience (urgency_impact: 4). Total score is 12, which is below the threshold of 14, but the issue should still be addressed. |
![entelligence-ai-pr-reviews[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/932812?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| ```python Python | ||
| request = toolset.initiate_connection(app=App.GITHUB) | ||
| print(f"Open this URL to authenticate: {request.redirectUrl}") | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The toolset variable is used in line 36 but it's initialized as composio_toolset in line 25, causing a reference error.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| ```python Python | |
| request = toolset.initiate_connection(app=App.GITHUB) | |
| print(f"Open this URL to authenticate: {request.redirectUrl}") | |
| ``` | |
| ```python Python | |
| request = composio_toolset.initiate_connection(app=App.GITHUB) | |
| print(f"Open this URL to authenticate: {request.redirectUrl}") |
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
| ```bash Python | ||
| import asyncio | ||
| import dotenv | ||
| from agents import Agent, Runner | ||
| from composio_openai_agents import Action, ComposioToolSet | ||
|
|
||
| # Initialize Composio toolset | ||
| composio_toolset = ComposioToolSet() | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The App class is used in lines 36 and 48 but is not imported in the code examples, causing a NameError.
📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| ```bash Python | |
| import asyncio | |
| import dotenv | |
| from agents import Agent, Runner | |
| from composio_openai_agents import Action, ComposioToolSet | |
| # Initialize Composio toolset | |
| composio_toolset = ComposioToolSet() | |
| ``` | |
| ```bash Python | |
| import asyncio | |
| import dotenv | |
| from agents import Agent, Runner | |
| from composio_openai_agents import Action, ComposioToolSet, App | |
| # Initialize Composio toolset | |
| composio_toolset = ComposioToolSet() |
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
|
🌿 Preview your docs: https://composio-preview-77676796-eb76-4d09-a083-10c095a954b3.docs.buildwithfern.com |
|
@Prat011 approved. just check if the PR reviews are relevant and merge. |
|
🌿 Preview your docs: https://composio-preview-067793b3-07a5-45a1-a5f7-b883d40da70c.docs.buildwithfern.com |
Review SummarySkipped posting 5 drafted comments based on your review threshold. Feel free to update them here. Draft Commentsfern/authentication/connection.mdx:59-67Scores:
Reason for filtering: The total score is below the required threshold of 14 for inclusion Analysis: This is a documentation issue with duplicate code examples that may confuse users but won't cause production failures. The fix is very clear and specific, simply removing the duplicate code block. However, this is a low urgency issue as it's in documentation and doesn't affect system functionality. fern/frameworks/anthropic.mdx:16-18Scores:
Reason for filtering: The comment addresses a minor documentation issue with an empty code block that has low production impact and urgency. Analysis: The issue is about an empty TypeScript code block in documentation. While the fix is very specific (adding npm install command), this has minimal production impact as it's purely documentation-related. Documentation completeness is important but not urgent, and users can likely still understand the content without this specific code block. Total score of 8 is below the required threshold of 14. fern/frameworks/anthropic.mdx:6-22Scores:
Reason for filtering: The total score is below the required threshold of 14 for inclusion. Analysis: This comment identifies missing usage instructions in documentation, which has minimal production impact (1) as it doesn't affect functionality. The fix is fairly specific (4) as it's clear what needs to be added. The urgency is low (2) as documentation issues don't break functionality. With a total score of 7, this falls below the required threshold of 14 for inclusion. js/Makefile:10-17Scores:
Reason for filtering: The issue is a minor code organization improvement with no production impact. It's about removing duplicate code in a Makefile by having clean_build depend on clean instead of duplicating the rm command. This is a code quality improvement that doesn't meet the high threshold for inclusion. Analysis: This comment addresses duplicate code in Makefile targets, which is a code organization issue. While the fix is very specific and easy to implement (5), it has minimal production impact (1) as both implementations work correctly. The urgency is very low (1) as this is purely a maintenance improvement. Total score of 7 falls well below the required threshold of 14. python/plugins/livekit/composio_livekit/toolset.py:96-141Scores:
Reason for filtering: The comment identifies a legitimate type mismatch that could cause issues with type checking or runtime behavior Analysis: The type mismatch between the function's return annotation (Dict[str, Any]) and actual return value (str) could cause type checking errors and potential runtime issues when other code expects a dictionary but receives a JSON string. The fix is clear and specific, changing the return type annotation from Dict[str, Any] to str. While this won't immediately crash production, it could lead to subtle bugs and integration issues. The total score is 13, which is below the threshold of 14, but the issue is still significant. |
No description provided.