Skip to content

docs: Add VoltAgent framework integration documentation #1568

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

omeraplak
Copy link

@omeraplak omeraplak commented Apr 23, 2025

Sweep Summary Sweep

Adds documentation for integrating Composio with VoltAgent framework, enabling VoltAgent agents to connect with external tools and services.

  • Created voltagent.mdx with step-by-step instructions for setting up and configuring VoltAgent with Composio.
  • Added practical example showing how to use MCPConfiguration to enable a VoltAgent agent to star GitHub repositories.
  • Updated navigation in docs.yml to include the new VoltAgent documentation page under the frameworks section.

Ask Sweep AI questions about this PR

This PR adds documentation for integrating Composio with VoltAgent agents, allowing them to connect with external tools and services.

The documentation includes step-by-step instructions on how to configure and use Composio with VoltAgent, with a practical example showing how to star GitHub repositories.

  • Added voltagent.mdx to the frameworks section

Includes complete setup instructions and working code examples
Demonstrates how to use MCPConfiguration with VoltAgent"

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 23, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
composio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 12, 2025 4:51pm

Copy link

Review Summary

Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on your review threshold. Feel free to update them here.

Draft Comments
fern/frameworks/voltagent.mdx:44-50
The `MCPConfiguration` is defined twice with different syntax. In the first example it's created with `new MCPConfiguration()` but in the execution example it's created with `new MCP()` which is inconsistent.

Scores:

  • Production Impact: 2
  • Fix Specificity: 5
  • Urgency Impact: 2
  • Total Score: 9

Reason for filtering: The comment identifies an inconsistency in API usage (MCPConfiguration vs MCP) but doesn't demonstrate a high production impact. The fix is straightforward but the issue is more of a documentation/consistency problem than a critical bug.

Analysis: The inconsistency in documentation is unlikely to cause production failures as it's just showing different ways to initialize the configuration. The fix is very specific and clear, but the urgency is low since this is a documentation consistency issue. With a total score of 9, which is below the threshold of 13, this comment should be removed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant