Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove deprecated classes and functions #1764

Closed
wants to merge 97 commits into from

Conversation

BDoignies
Copy link
Contributor

PR Description

Remove deprecated classes and functions.

  • Questionable changes may be made to the LocalConvolutionNormalVectorEstimator test codes. See the relevant commit message for more details.
  • Some tests might be remove as the class they were used to test no longer exists (although there is a replacement)
  • Shapes::addNorm1Ball and Shapes::addNorm2Ball are marked as deprecated but this seems inconsistent because 'Shapes::removeNorm1Ball' and 'Shapes::removeNorm2Ball' are not. Furthermore, they are still widely used. I did not remove them but I can if anyone you confirm they should be removed.

Checklist

  • [?] Unit-test of your feature with Catch.
  • Doxygen documentation of the code completed (classes, methods, types, members...)
  • [?] Documentation module page added or updated.
  • New entry in the ChangeLog.md added.
  • No warning raised in Debug mode.
  • All continuous integration tests pass (Github Actions)

BDoignies and others added 27 commits February 7, 2025 15:02
CMake V2 + Cpp20 + (Almost) Header only
List of changes:
* Remove "LocalConvolutionNormalVectorEstimator" and "BasicConvolutionWeights"
* Tests using the class now uses the replacement "LocalEstomatorFromSurfelFunctorAdapter"
* Added an overload to eval() function required by some tests
* Added a function evalAll required by some tests
* Remove subtype DigitalSurfaceEmbedderWithNormalVectorEstimator::NVESurface (it was not used anywhere else) and corresponding assert.
* Remove concept check CNormalVectorEstimator as it does not correspond to the new method and was only used at a single place.
@BDoignies BDoignies requested a review from dcoeurjo March 3, 2025 17:11
@BDoignies BDoignies closed this Mar 3, 2025
@BDoignies
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry wrong merge destination...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants