Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump jinja2 from 3.1.5 to 3.1.6 in /docs/cloud-workload-security/scripts #35127

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 14, 2025

Bumps jinja2 from 3.1.5 to 3.1.6.

Release notes

Sourced from jinja2's releases.

3.1.6

This is the Jinja 3.1.6 security release, which fixes security issues but does not otherwise change behavior and should not result in breaking changes compared to the latest feature release.

PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/Jinja2/3.1.6/ Changes: https://jinja.palletsprojects.com/en/stable/changes/#version-3-1-6

  • The |attr filter does not bypass the environment's attribute lookup, allowing the sandbox to apply its checks. GHSA-cpwx-vrp4-4pq7
Changelog

Sourced from jinja2's changelog.

Version 3.1.6

Released 2025-03-05

  • The |attr filter does not bypass the environment's attribute lookup, allowing the sandbox to apply its checks. :ghsa:cpwx-vrp4-4pq7
Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
    You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

Bumps [jinja2](https://github.com/pallets/jinja) from 3.1.5 to 3.1.6.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/pallets/jinja/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/pallets/jinja/blob/main/CHANGES.rst)
- [Commits](pallets/jinja@3.1.5...3.1.6)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: jinja2
  dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies PRs that bump a dependency python Pull requests that update Python code labels Mar 14, 2025
@dependabot dependabot bot requested review from a team as code owners March 14, 2025 14:13
@github-actions github-actions bot added team/agent-security short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Mar 14, 2025
@paulcacheux paulcacheux added qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation changelog/no-changelog labels Mar 14, 2025
@paulcacheux
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Mar 14, 2025

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
2025-03-14 14:14:23 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2025-03-14 14:14:32 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2025-03-14 18:15:04 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 841fd5b719f5e23615b9fe0a17fd3da9bbc41b2a

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 807.48MB 807.48MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 817.27MB 817.27MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 817.27MB 817.27MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 798.45MB 798.45MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 808.22MB 808.22MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 39.34MB 39.34MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 39.42MB 39.42MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 39.42MB 39.42MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 37.87MB 37.87MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 440.39MB 440.39MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 62.20MB 62.20MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 62.27MB 62.27MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 62.27MB 62.27MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 59.42MB 59.42MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 59.49MB 59.49MB 0.50MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Static quality checks ✅

Please find below the results from static quality gates

Successful checks

Info

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 781.08 MiB 801.8 MiB 190.69 MiB 202.62 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_arm64 772.45 MiB 793.14 MiB 173.76 MiB 184.51 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64 781.07 MiB 801.79 MiB 193.37 MiB 205.03 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64 772.44 MiB 793.09 MiB 174.52 MiB 186.44 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_amd64 781.07 MiB 801.81 MiB 193.37 MiB 205.03 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64 772.44 MiB 793.14 MiB 174.52 MiB 186.44 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_amd64 37.59 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.74 MiB 19.78 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_arm64 36.19 MiB 46.27 MiB 8.45 MiB 18.49 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 37.59 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.75 MiB 19.79 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_suse_amd64 37.59 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.75 MiB 19.79 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_amd64 59.39 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.92 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_arm64 56.74 MiB 66.4 MiB 12.89 MiB 22.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_amd64 59.39 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.95 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_arm64 56.74 MiB 66.4 MiB 12.88 MiB 22.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_suse_amd64 59.39 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.95 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 866.22 MiB 886.12 MiB 291.45 MiB 304.21 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_arm64 880.87 MiB 900.79 MiB 277.88 MiB 290.47 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1.04 GiB 1.06 GiB 366.55 MiB 379.33 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_arm64 1.04 GiB 1.06 GiB 348.93 MiB 361.55 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_amd64 45.73 MiB 55.78 MiB 17.25 MiB 27.28 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_arm64 44.37 MiB 54.45 MiB 16.13 MiB 26.16 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_amd64 264.87 MiB 274.78 MiB 106.3 MiB 116.28 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_arm64 280.81 MiB 290.82 MiB 101.13 MiB 111.12 MiB

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 58850785 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_deb-arm64-py3
  • tests_deb-x64-py3
  • tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
  • tests_rpm-arm64-py3
  • tests_rpm-x64-py3
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 854ebb16-9d98-4881-9c87-ca4771e27838

Baseline: 841fd5b
Comparison: 5d20e08
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +3.48 [+0.61, +6.35] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.84 [+0.77, +0.91] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.58 [-0.24, +1.41] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.53 [+0.48, +0.58] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.09 [-0.69, +0.87] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.02 [-0.61, +0.65] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.01 [-0.74, +0.76] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.01, +0.02] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization +0.00 [-0.04, +0.04] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.28, +0.27] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.00 [-0.86, +0.85] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.71, +0.68] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.82, +0.79] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.07 [-0.83, +0.70] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.10 [-0.56, +0.37] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.39 [-0.50, -0.28] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.52 [-0.58, -0.46] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog dependencies PRs that bump a dependency python Pull requests that update Python code qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-security
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant