Skip to content

tagger: Add gpu_driver_version tag to GPU entities#35128

Merged
dd-mergequeue[bot] merged 6 commits intomainfrom
guillermo.julian/driver-as-tag
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

tagger: Add gpu_driver_version tag to GPU entities#35128
dd-mergequeue[bot] merged 6 commits intomainfrom
guillermo.julian/driver-as-tag

Conversation

@gjulianm
Copy link
Contributor

@gjulianm gjulianm commented Mar 14, 2025

What does this PR do?

Adds the gpu_driver_version tag to GPU metrics.

Motivation

Enable comparison of behavior between different GPU drivers.

Describe how you validated your changes

E2E test passing.

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@gjulianm gjulianm self-assigned this Mar 14, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/container-platform The Container Platform Team labels Mar 14, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

dda inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=59319147 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit c0639d5

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor d0636a2248a437162b3d9d1b8ffc743f39a39ccd

Size reduction summary
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm -0.00MB 808.40MB 808.40MB 0.50MB
Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 817.45MB 817.45MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 817.45MB 817.45MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 807.66MB 807.65MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 798.62MB 798.62MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 39.33MB 39.33MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 39.41MB 39.41MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 39.41MB 39.41MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 37.86MB 37.86MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 440.61MB 440.61MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 62.22MB 62.22MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 62.29MB 62.29MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 62.29MB 62.29MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 59.44MB 59.44MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 59.51MB 59.51MB 0.50MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Static quality checks ✅

Please find below the results from static quality gates

Successful checks

Info

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 781.75 MiB 801.8 MiB 190.78 MiB 202.62 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_arm64 773.11 MiB 793.14 MiB 172.37 MiB 184.51 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64 781.7 MiB 801.79 MiB 193.35 MiB 205.03 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64 773.15 MiB 793.09 MiB 174.62 MiB 186.44 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_amd64 781.66 MiB 801.81 MiB 193.35 MiB 205.03 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64 773.14 MiB 793.14 MiB 174.62 MiB 186.44 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_amd64 37.59 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.74 MiB 19.78 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_arm64 36.18 MiB 46.27 MiB 8.45 MiB 18.49 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 37.59 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.75 MiB 19.79 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_suse_amd64 37.59 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.75 MiB 19.79 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_amd64 59.41 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.92 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_arm64 56.76 MiB 66.4 MiB 12.88 MiB 22.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_amd64 59.41 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.95 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_arm64 56.76 MiB 66.4 MiB 12.88 MiB 22.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_suse_amd64 59.41 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.95 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 866.39 MiB 886.12 MiB 291.48 MiB 304.21 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_arm64 881.04 MiB 900.79 MiB 277.88 MiB 290.47 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1.04 GiB 1.06 GiB 366.57 MiB 379.33 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_arm64 1.04 GiB 1.06 GiB 348.96 MiB 361.55 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_amd64 45.73 MiB 55.78 MiB 17.24 MiB 27.28 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_arm64 44.36 MiB 54.45 MiB 16.11 MiB 26.16 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_amd64 264.89 MiB 274.78 MiB 106.29 MiB 116.28 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_arm64 280.84 MiB 290.82 MiB 101.12 MiB 111.12 MiB

@cit-pr-commenter
Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 893131ae-d9ca-47bf-ad00-0841cf5fbf15

Baseline: d0636a2
Comparison: c0639d5
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.90 [+0.01, +1.79] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.32 [+0.25, +0.40] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_tree memory utilization +0.09 [-0.05, +0.23] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization +0.04 [-0.01, +0.10] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.04 [-0.84, +0.91] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.60, +0.66] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.02 [-0.80, +0.83] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.82, +0.84] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.30, +0.31] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.03, +0.03] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.00 [-0.70, +0.69] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -0.07 [-2.92, +2.78] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.07 [-0.85, +0.71] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.19 [-0.65, +0.28] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.24 [-0.31, -0.18] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.30 [-1.07, +0.47] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.97 [-1.04, -0.90] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@gjulianm gjulianm added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Mar 14, 2025
@gjulianm gjulianm force-pushed the guillermo.julian/driver-as-tag branch from 65e8c3a to 1870733 Compare March 18, 2025 09:50
@gjulianm gjulianm marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2025 12:04
@gjulianm gjulianm requested review from a team as code owners March 18, 2025 12:04
@gjulianm gjulianm added the ask-review Ask required teams to review this PR label Mar 19, 2025
KubeGPUUUID = "gpu_uuid"

// GPUDriver is the tag for the GPU driver
GPUDriver = "gpu_driver"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be more like gpu_driver_version to be closer to the real value meaning?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It makes more sense indeed, changed

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for nitpicking again, but the variable should probably be renamed to GPUDriverVersion.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

np, changed!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect, just added this: #35128 (comment)
Approved 👍

@github-actions github-actions bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Mar 19, 2025
@gjulianm
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Mar 19, 2025

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
2025-03-19 14:25:48 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2025-03-19 14:26:06 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2025-03-19 18:27:04 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

@gjulianm
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Mar 20, 2025

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.
2025-03-20 09:39:33 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2025-03-20 09:39:37 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 52m (p90).


2025-03-20 10:12:26 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit d6170b5 into main Mar 20, 2025
250 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the guillermo.julian/driver-as-tag branch March 20, 2025 10:12
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.65.0 milestone Mar 20, 2025
@val06 val06 changed the title tagger: Add gpu_driver tag to GPU entities tagger: Add gpu_driver_version tag to GPU entities Mar 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ask-review Ask required teams to review this PR changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed medium review PR review might take time qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/container-platform The Container Platform Team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants