Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CWS] Keep cookie set when adding profiles to the pending cache #35130

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

YoannGh
Copy link
Contributor

@YoannGh YoannGh commented Mar 14, 2025

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Profiles added to the pendingCache have their cookie reset to 0.
This causes all profiles loaded from this cache to share the same cookie (0) when these profiles need to be reused.

Describe how you validated your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@YoannGh YoannGh added changelog/no-changelog team/agent-security qa/rc-required Only for a PR that requires validation on the Release Candidate labels Mar 14, 2025
@YoannGh YoannGh requested a review from a team as a code owner March 14, 2025 16:16
@github-actions github-actions bot added component/system-probe short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Mar 14, 2025
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

dda inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=58871425 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 815b6a6

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 17329b350f3e31ef8bb7906e842e1989486ec097

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 807.45MB 807.45MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 817.24MB 817.24MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 817.24MB 817.24MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 798.42MB 798.42MB 0.50MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 808.19MB 808.19MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 39.34MB 39.34MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 39.42MB 39.42MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 39.42MB 39.42MB 0.50MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 37.87MB 37.87MB 0.50MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 440.39MB 440.39MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 62.20MB 62.20MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 62.27MB 62.27MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 62.27MB 62.27MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 59.42MB 59.42MB 0.50MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 59.49MB 59.49MB 0.50MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Static quality checks ❌

Please find below the results from static quality gates

Error

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64 DataNotFound 801.79 MiB DataNotFound 205.03 MiB
Gate failure full details
Quality gate Error type Error message
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64 StackTrace Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/go/src/github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/tasks/quality_gates.py", line 124, in parse_and_trigger_gates
gate_mod.entrypoint(**gate_inputs)
File "/go/src/github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/tasks/static_quality_gates/static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64.py", line 5, in entrypoint
generic_package_agent_quality_gate(
File "/go/src/github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/tasks/static_quality_gates/lib/package_agent_lib.py", line 69, in generic_package_agent_quality_gate
package_on_wire_size, package_on_disk_size = calculate_package_size(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/go/src/github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/tasks/static_quality_gates/lib/package_agent_lib.py", line 10, in calculate_package_size
extract_package(ctx=ctx, package_os=package_os, package_path=package_path, extract_dir=extract_dir)
File "/go/src/github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/tasks/libs/package/size.py", line 72, in extract_package
return extract_rpm_package(ctx, package_path, extract_dir)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/go/src/github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/tasks/libs/package/size.py", line 65, in extract_rpm_package
ctx.run(f"rpm2cpio {package_path}
Successful checks

Info

Result Quality gate On disk size On disk size limit On wire size On wire size limit
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 781.61 MiB 801.8 MiB 190.75 MiB 202.62 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_deb_arm64 772.97 MiB 793.14 MiB 173.16 MiB 184.51 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_arm64 772.96 MiB 793.09 MiB 174.51 MiB 186.44 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_amd64 781.58 MiB 801.81 MiB 193.35 MiB 205.03 MiB
static_quality_gate_agent_suse_arm64 772.91 MiB 793.14 MiB 174.51 MiB 186.44 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_amd64 37.59 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.75 MiB 19.78 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_deb_arm64 36.19 MiB 46.27 MiB 8.45 MiB 18.49 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 37.59 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.75 MiB 19.79 MiB
static_quality_gate_dogstatsd_suse_amd64 37.59 MiB 47.67 MiB 9.75 MiB 19.79 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_amd64 59.39 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.92 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_deb_arm64 56.75 MiB 66.4 MiB 12.89 MiB 22.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_amd64 59.39 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.94 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_rpm_arm64 56.75 MiB 66.4 MiB 12.88 MiB 22.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_iot_agent_suse_amd64 59.39 MiB 69.0 MiB 14.94 MiB 24.8 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_amd64 866.19 MiB 886.12 MiB 291.42 MiB 304.21 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_arm64 880.84 MiB 900.79 MiB 277.86 MiB 290.47 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1.04 GiB 1.06 GiB 366.54 MiB 379.33 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_agent_jmx_arm64 1.04 GiB 1.06 GiB 348.94 MiB 361.55 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_amd64 45.73 MiB 55.78 MiB 17.25 MiB 27.28 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_dogstatsd_arm64 44.37 MiB 54.45 MiB 16.13 MiB 26.16 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_amd64 264.87 MiB 274.78 MiB 106.3 MiB 116.28 MiB
static_quality_gate_docker_cluster_agent_arm64 280.81 MiB 290.82 MiB 101.12 MiB 111.12 MiB

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: a010783b-1598-4f94-96c7-1fdd0b46d1ce

Baseline: 17329b3
Comparison: 815b6a6
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
file_tree memory utilization +1.86 [+1.62, +2.09] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +1.83 [-1.00, +4.66] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization +0.39 [+0.34, +0.44] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.01 [-0.83, +0.85] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.62, +0.63] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.01, +0.03] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.00 [-0.76, +0.77] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.01 [-0.09, +0.08] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.01 [-0.83, +0.81] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.31, +0.28] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.76, +0.71] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.05 [-0.83, +0.73] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.55 [-1.02, -0.09] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.74 [-0.81, -0.68] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.80 [-1.58, -0.02] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -1.81 [-2.63, -0.99] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -4.05 [-4.18, -3.93] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog component/system-probe qa/rc-required Only for a PR that requires validation on the Release Candidate short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-security
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant