Skip to content

Add consistent sampling via knuth's method #5386

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bm1549
Copy link
Contributor

@bm1549 bm1549 commented Mar 10, 2025

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Plugin Checklist

Additional Notes

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Overall package size

Self size: 8.96 MB
Deduped: 101.5 MB
No deduping: 102.01 MB

Dependency sizes | name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | @datadog/libdatadog | 0.5.0 | 29.83 MB | 29.83 MB | | @datadog/native-appsec | 8.5.0 | 19.26 MB | 19.26 MB | | @datadog/native-iast-taint-tracking | 3.3.0 | 13.77 MB | 13.78 MB | | @datadog/pprof | 5.5.1 | 9.79 MB | 10.17 MB | | @opentelemetry/core | 1.30.1 | 908.66 kB | 7.16 MB | | protobufjs | 7.4.0 | 2.77 MB | 5.42 MB | | @datadog/native-iast-rewriter | 2.8.0 | 2.6 MB | 2.74 MB | | @datadog/native-metrics | 3.1.0 | 1.06 MB | 1.46 MB | | @opentelemetry/api | 1.8.0 | 1.21 MB | 1.21 MB | | import-in-the-middle | 1.13.1 | 117.64 kB | 839.26 kB | | source-map | 0.7.4 | 226 kB | 226 kB | | opentracing | 0.14.7 | 194.81 kB | 194.81 kB | | lru-cache | 7.18.3 | 133.92 kB | 133.92 kB | | pprof-format | 2.1.0 | 111.69 kB | 111.69 kB | | @datadog/sketches-js | 2.1.1 | 109.9 kB | 109.9 kB | | lodash.sortby | 4.7.0 | 75.76 kB | 75.76 kB | | ignore | 5.3.2 | 53.63 kB | 53.63 kB | | istanbul-lib-coverage | 3.2.0 | 29.34 kB | 29.34 kB | | rfdc | 1.4.1 | 27.15 kB | 27.15 kB | | @isaacs/ttlcache | 1.4.1 | 25.2 kB | 25.2 kB | | tlhunter-sorted-set | 0.1.0 | 24.94 kB | 24.94 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.6 | 24.56 kB | 24.56 kB | | shell-quote | 1.8.2 | 23.54 kB | 23.54 kB | | limiter | 1.1.5 | 23.17 kB | 23.17 kB | | retry | 0.13.1 | 18.85 kB | 18.85 kB | | semifies | 1.0.0 | 15.84 kB | 15.84 kB | | jest-docblock | 29.7.0 | 8.99 kB | 12.76 kB | | crypto-randomuuid | 1.0.0 | 11.18 kB | 11.18 kB | | ttl-set | 1.0.0 | 4.61 kB | 9.69 kB | | path-to-regexp | 0.1.12 | 6.6 kB | 6.6 kB | | koalas | 1.0.2 | 6.47 kB | 6.47 kB | | module-details-from-path | 1.0.3 | 4.47 kB | 4.47 kB |

🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.89%. Comparing base (4cfe991) to head (89b99e6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5386      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.59%   78.89%   -1.70%     
==========================================
  Files         494      329     -165     
  Lines       22082    13324    -8758     
==========================================
- Hits        17797    10512    -7285     
+ Misses       4285     2812    -1473     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1
Copy link

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Datadog Report

Branch report: brian.marks/knuth-sampling
Commit report: da6105d
Test service: dd-trace-js-integration-tests

✅ 0 Failed, 800 Passed, 0 Skipped, 10m 58.93s Total Time

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-03-14 17:53:39

Comparing candidate commit 89b99e6 in PR branch brian.marks/knuth-sampling with baseline commit 4cfe991 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 916 metrics, 17 unstable metrics.

@bm1549 bm1549 force-pushed the brian.marks/knuth-sampling branch from 061fb6b to e559aab Compare March 10, 2025 20:13
@bm1549 bm1549 force-pushed the brian.marks/knuth-sampling branch from e559aab to 89b99e6 Compare March 14, 2025 17:45
Comment on lines +55 to +57
toTraceIdNumber (get128BitId = false) {
return parseInt(this.toTraceId(get128BitId), 16)
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is actually going to be much slower than directly getting the number. This does number -> string -> number instead of just read number.

return this._rate === 1 || Math.random() < this._rate
isSampled (context) {
return this._rate === 1 ||
((context.toTraceIdNumber(false) * KNUTH_FACTOR) % MAX_TRACE_ID) <= this._sampling_id_threshold
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I fail to understand how this shall work.

As far as I understand the Knuth sampling, it has a reservoir of samples and it replaces those during a processing time window depending on the input. This is done randomly with a decreasing chance of replacing items already in the reservoir. Here, the chance seems constant, if I am not mistaken. I read it as if it never takes into account how many we have already processed in a specific time window.

I might also misunderstand how it should work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants