Skip to content

Update temporal check to temporal v1.28.0 #20627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

phuongdnguyen
Copy link
Contributor

@phuongdnguyen phuongdnguyen commented Jul 1, 2025

What does this PR do?

  • Add script to update metrics list.
  • Generate metrics & metadata to support metrics up to temporal v1.28.0

Motivation

Support metrics in newer temporal version as OOTB
Split from #20142
First part: #20469

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
  • If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.09%. Comparing base (6ac4440) to head (e0be1b8).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
Flag Coverage Δ
activemq ?
cassandra ?
confluent_platform ?
hive ?
hivemq ?
hudi ?
ignite ?
jboss_wildfly ?
kafka ?
presto ?
solr ?
temporal 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
tomcat ?
weblogic ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@phuongdnguyen phuongdnguyen marked this pull request as draft July 1, 2025 12:27
@phuongdnguyen phuongdnguyen marked this pull request as ready for review July 2, 2025 05:37
@phuongdnguyen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @iliakur , appreciate your review 🙇‍♂️

@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ def test_check(dd_run_check, aggregator, check, mock_metrics):
aggregator.assert_metric_has_tag(metric, tag)

aggregator.assert_metrics_using_metadata(get_metadata_metrics())
aggregator.assert_all_metrics_covered()
Copy link
Contributor Author

@phuongdnguyen phuongdnguyen Jul 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove this assertion because we must keep the integration working against several upstream versions - where some metrics appear or disappear between releases and the test already covered a subset of core metrics, wdyt @iliakur ?

@@ -1,619 +1,957 @@
metric_name,metric_type,interval,unit_name,per_unit_name,description,orientation,integration,short_name,curated_metric
Copy link
Contributor Author

@phuongdnguyen phuongdnguyen Jul 2, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The sample_tags column is generated by ddev validate metadata temporal --sync. I believe it was added in #17521

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants