-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Update temporal check to temporal v1.28.0 #20627
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update temporal check to temporal v1.28.0 #20627
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Hi @iliakur , appreciate your review 🙇♂️ |
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ def test_check(dd_run_check, aggregator, check, mock_metrics): | |||
aggregator.assert_metric_has_tag(metric, tag) | |||
|
|||
aggregator.assert_metrics_using_metadata(get_metadata_metrics()) | |||
aggregator.assert_all_metrics_covered() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove this assertion because we must keep the integration working against several upstream versions - where some metrics appear or disappear between releases and the test already covered a subset of core metrics, wdyt @iliakur ?
@@ -1,619 +1,957 @@ | |||
metric_name,metric_type,interval,unit_name,per_unit_name,description,orientation,integration,short_name,curated_metric |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The sample_tags
column is generated by ddev validate metadata temporal --sync
. I believe it was added in #17521
What does this PR do?
Motivation
Support metrics in newer temporal version as OOTB
Split from #20142
First part: #20469
Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)
qa/skip-qa
label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.backport/<branch-name>
label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged