Redis enterprise - added dash to name of overview dashboard

[j8-redis]

What does this PR do?

A brief description of the change being made with this pull request.

Motivation

What inspired you to submit this pull request?

Review checklist

• PR has a meaningful title or PR has the no-changelog label attached
• Feature or bugfix has tests
• Git history is clean
• If PR impacts documentation, docs team has been notified or an issue has been opened on the documentation repo
• If this PR includes a log pipeline, please add a description describing the remappers and processors.

Additional Notes

Anything else we should know when reviewing?

[bgoldberg122]

Looks good to me once those last few tests are passing (you can ignore the Validate repository check)

[j8-redis]

HI
I've reverted the CODEOWNERS commit and now it's showing up as a failure. Should I assume that I can ignore this failure as well as the lint issue? I think I have a fix for the lint issue but it's ugly and not good practice.

[bgoldberg122]

HI I've reverted the CODEOWNERS commit and now it's showing up as a failure. Should I assume that I can ignore this failure as well as the lint issue? I think I have a fix for the lint issue but it's ugly and not good practice.

@j8-redis Yes, you can ignore the CODEOWNERS failure. I think the lint issue needs to be fixed though -- @iliakur can you please confirm?

[alai97]

Looks good for docs

[iliakur]

HI I've reverted the CODEOWNERS commit and now it's showing up as a failure. Should I assume that I can ignore this failure as well as the lint issue? I think I have a fix for the lint issue but it's ugly and not good practice.

@j8-redis Yes, you can ignore the CODEOWNERS failure. I think the lint issue needs to be fixed though -- @iliakur can you please confirm?

@j8-redis @bgoldberg122 the validation is in fact correct. The logs-backend team wants to co-own all logs pipelines in integrations. So you should get the validation to pass by adding them back to Codeowners please.

[bgoldberg122]

HI I've reverted the CODEOWNERS commit and now it's showing up as a failure. Should I assume that I can ignore this failure as well as the lint issue? I think I have a fix for the lint issue but it's ugly and not good practice.

@j8-redis Yes, you can ignore the CODEOWNERS failure. I think the lint issue needs to be fixed though -- @iliakur can you please confirm?

@j8-redis @bgoldberg122 the validation is in fact correct. The logs-backend team wants to co-own all logs pipelines in integrations. So you should get the validation to pass by adding them back to Codeowners please.

@iliakur The codeowners error is not for this integration, so I will fix it in a separate PR