Skip to content

test(fuzz): add fuzzing for dpapi-pdu structures #415

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Apr 17, 2025

Conversation

TheBestTvarynka
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,
This is the same PR as #412, but with addressed comments. I reverted these changes in #410 and submitting them again.

This PR should be merged after #410.

@TheBestTvarynka TheBestTvarynka self-assigned this Apr 14, 2025
@TheBestTvarynka TheBestTvarynka requested a review from CBenoit April 14, 2025 10:11
@TheBestTvarynka TheBestTvarynka force-pushed the feat/dpapi-pdu-fuzzing branch from 094ad9e to d20c5ad Compare April 15, 2025 11:05
Base automatically changed from feat/ws-tunneling-support to feat/dpapi-wasm-support April 15, 2025 15:06
@TheBestTvarynka TheBestTvarynka force-pushed the feat/dpapi-pdu-fuzzing branch 2 times, most recently from ac45416 to ca6e03e Compare April 15, 2025 15:41
@TheBestTvarynka TheBestTvarynka force-pushed the feat/dpapi-pdu-fuzzing branch from ca6e03e to ca13365 Compare April 15, 2025 15:42
@TheBestTvarynka TheBestTvarynka marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2025 15:43
@CBenoit
Copy link
Member

CBenoit commented Apr 17, 2025

LGTM!

@CBenoit CBenoit merged commit 858073c into feat/dpapi-wasm-support Apr 17, 2025
42 checks passed
@CBenoit CBenoit deleted the feat/dpapi-pdu-fuzzing branch April 17, 2025 05:56
pub fn round_trip(any: AnyStruct) {
let mut buf = WriteBuf::new();

if let Ok(name) = any.encode(&mut buf) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

question: By the way, we have structs that can't be encoded without it being a bug?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants