Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix trading mode init #1177

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 14, 2020
Merged

fix trading mode init #1177

merged 1 commit into from
May 14, 2020

Conversation

GuillaumeDSM
Copy link
Member

@GuillaumeDSM GuillaumeDSM requested a review from Herklos May 12, 2020 21:34
@GuillaumeDSM GuillaumeDSM self-assigned this May 12, 2020
@Herklos
Copy link
Member

Herklos commented May 13, 2020

I don't understand the goal of this PR

@GuillaumeDSM
Copy link
Member Author

I don't understand the goal of this PR

Trading modes advanced classes are initialized in exchange_builder now, that's an issue because if 2 or more exchanges are created, advanced classes are duplicated also. Trading mode advanced classes should be managed independently from exchange creation

@Herklos
Copy link
Member

Herklos commented May 13, 2020

I don't understand the goal of this PR

Trading modes advanced classes are initialized in exchange_builder now, that's an issue because if 2 or more exchanges are created, advanced classes are duplicated also. Trading mode advanced classes should be managed independently from exchange creation

Ok I understand. Can we move that to the Tentacle Manager ?

@GuillaumeDSM GuillaumeDSM merged commit a0352c8 into 0.4.0 May 14, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the multiple_fixes branch May 14, 2020 21:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants