Conversation
Contributor
Contributor
Author
|
@nidhibhammar could I get a review and merge on this please, thanks |
edbshubham
approved these changes
May 14, 2025
Merged
edb-slonik
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 16, 2025
edb-slonik
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 16, 2025
Edits to pem 5549/dnf option #6704
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add details of --allowerasing option that allows dnf upgrade to work when going from PEM 9 to 10