Skip to content

mlir: enable mincut support for scf.for #2359

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 26, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Pangoraw
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.


// nothing to do
if (updatedGradients.empty() && caches.empty())
return success();

if (forOp->hasAttr("enzyme.enable_mincut")) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think we should make this the default [and optionally disable]

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we'll also want to add this to affine.for/{scf,affine}.parallel

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense, i will follow-up with those (i don't think we have the rev rules for these ops yet)

// CHECK-NEXT: %c0 = arith.constant 0 : index
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[v0:.+]] = tensor.empty() : tensor<10xf32>
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[for:.+]]:2 = scf.for %arg2 = %c0 to %c10 step %c1 iter_args(%arg3 = %arg0, %arg4 = %[[v0]]) -> (f32, tensor<10xf32>) {
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[cache:.+]] = tensor.insert %arg3 into %arg4[%arg2] : tensor<10xf32>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should likely prefer using a memref alloca of the correct size, store in fwd, load in reverse, and free after the for

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Pangoraw Pangoraw Jun 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it will create a cache<memref> for the parent op so the alloca has to be hoisted all the way to the top (and would be invalid for upcoming autodiff deferred). IIRC, that's why I went with an immutable data structure at the time.

We can write a bufferization pass that converts this to memref once all push/pop have been removed ?

@wsmoses
Copy link
Member

wsmoses commented Jun 26, 2025

@Pangoraw I'm going to merge for now, can you address in post commit follow up

@wsmoses wsmoses merged commit 042e567 into EnzymeAD:main Jun 26, 2025
18 of 23 checks passed
gbaraldi pushed a commit to gbaraldi/Enzyme that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants