Skip to content

Conversation

@furtib
Copy link
Contributor

@furtib furtib commented Sep 8, 2025

Why:
We want to produce the result plist file for all analyzer that was used.

What:
Recreated the bash wrapper script in Python.
Changed the rule to declare output files based on the enabled checkers argument.
Added a function to merge the default and custom arguments for CodeChecker

Addresses:
Fixes: #17

Depends on:
#81

@furtib furtib self-assigned this Sep 8, 2025
@furtib furtib added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 8, 2025
@furtib furtib requested a review from Szelethus September 8, 2025 14:13
@furtib furtib marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2025 14:13
@furtib furtib changed the title Distributed rule use all analyzers Distributed rule use cppcheck Sep 12, 2025
@furtib furtib changed the title Distributed rule use cppcheck Distributed rule use all analyzers Sep 12, 2025
@furtib furtib closed this Sep 15, 2025
@furtib furtib deleted the distributed_rule_use_all_analyzers branch September 15, 2025 09:52
@furtib furtib restored the distributed_rule_use_all_analyzers branch September 15, 2025 09:52
@furtib furtib reopened this Sep 15, 2025
@furtib furtib changed the title Distributed rule use all analyzers Make distributed rule, dynamicly declare plist files for all analyzers Sep 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

cppcheck doesn't run on code_checker

1 participant