Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setup ci tests #119

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Setup ci tests #119

merged 7 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham commented Oct 3, 2024

Coming from https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1727942903497109

We have lint and test in this repo but don't run them on PRs, so their value is diminished. Also, they can be broken without us noticing, which makes work for other people in the future to fix them.

This PR adds jest and eslint workflows to PRs, and gets them both passing.

@roryabraham roryabraham self-assigned this Oct 3, 2024
@roryabraham roryabraham changed the title [WIP] Setup ci tests Setup ci tests Oct 3, 2024
@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

@carlosmiceli Pullerbear doesn't work in this repo and GitHub suggested you for review and I just went with it

@carlosmiceli
Copy link
Contributor

No prob sir! Main question is what's the reasoning and logic for the rule exceptions you're introducing (max-len, no-case).

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mostly just expedience and not wanting to break stuff 🙂

@carlosmiceli carlosmiceli merged commit 1744186 into main Oct 3, 2024
2 checks passed
@carlosmiceli carlosmiceli deleted the Rory-SetupCITests branch October 3, 2024 19:28
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2024

🚀 Published in 2.0.61

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants