Progressive JPEG #245
Open
Progressive JPEG #245
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Mar 30, 2016
|
What's the status on this pull request? When will it be accepted? |
|
Seems to be good and simple enough. Just need to find time to take a closer look. |
|
Hi @EyalAr , |
|
Please get this IN. Its Must for faster response. |
|
Any update on this ? |
|
@sharkovich you can pull the changes from master please? |
randytarampi
added a commit
to randytarampi/lwip
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2020
Progressive JPEG support per #29 Closes #29 and EyalAr#245
randytarampi
added a commit
to randytarampi/lwip
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have implemented an option to create progressive JPEG buffers. It does not break any existing functionality or require any migration steps. Progressive JPEGs are already supported in Independent JPEG Group's library. This feature was needed by myself and also was already requested.