-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#319 adding 3 columns to matchmaker_queue_map_pool table #320
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
#319 adding 3 columns to matchmaker_queue_map_pool table #320
Conversation
ALTER TABLE matchmaker_queue_map_pool | ||
ADD COLUMN veto_tokens_per_player TINYINT UNSIGNED DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL, | ||
ADD COLUMN max_tokens_per_map TINYINT UNSIGNED DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL, | ||
ADD COLUMN minimal_maps_allowed FLOAT DEFAULT 1 NOT NULL CHECK (minimal_maps_allowed >= 1); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would name minimal_maps_allowed
differently. It is a restriction, not an allowance. I get what it is supposed to mean, but it is a bit confusing. Maybe minimal_maps_left
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand either of the names. What is the effect of this value?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand either of the names. What is the effect of this value?
its the minimal maps count which should left after all vetoes applied
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
system will nerf veto tokens if necessary until this is true
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
about the name i dont really care, but PRs to the api and mod client should also be changed accordingly, if you change it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like minimum_maps_after_veto
. It's a descriptive name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok i will set "minimum_maps_after_veto" and will update other repos / PRs accordingly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i want to set it like CHECK (minimum_maps_after_veto > 0)
but this can lead to questions like "what is 0.5 maps after veto means"
should i rename it to "minimal_sum_of_map_weights_after_veto" instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that would be more accurate description of the variable
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
solves #319