Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow DA recorded blocks to come out-of-order #2415

Open
wants to merge 25 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
25 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
448d8c2
Remove height parameter, change tests
MitchTurner Oct 30, 2024
c5866a3
Modify to take vec instead of range
MitchTurner Oct 30, 2024
c54f098
Add tests to make sure it is sane
MitchTurner Oct 30, 2024
fcf4477
Rename variable
MitchTurner Oct 30, 2024
159d5b4
Fix analyzer
MitchTurner Oct 30, 2024
ba080ff
Rename some params
MitchTurner Oct 30, 2024
d2b3c28
Use slice instead of vec
MitchTurner Oct 30, 2024
128a9ba
Merge branch 'master' into feature/allow-DA-blocks-to-be-received-out…
MitchTurner Oct 30, 2024
5f19932
Cleanup code a bit
MitchTurner Oct 31, 2024
922f3e0
Update crates/fuel-gas-price-algorithm/src/v1/tests/update_da_record_…
MitchTurner Oct 31, 2024
d7e9bdd
Pick nit
MitchTurner Oct 31, 2024
12c517e
Merge branch 'master' into feature/allow-DA-blocks-to-be-received-out…
MitchTurner Oct 31, 2024
f8dca06
Merge branch 'master' into feature/allow-DA-blocks-to-be-received-out…
MitchTurner Oct 31, 2024
2bb86fe
Optimize projected calc by caching running total
MitchTurner Nov 1, 2024
60771e9
Merge branch 'master' into feature/allow-DA-blocks-to-be-received-out…
MitchTurner Nov 1, 2024
03da963
Fix analyzer
MitchTurner Nov 1, 2024
ea14e6f
Simplify metadata
MitchTurner Nov 1, 2024
b615b33
Merge branch 'master' into feature/allow-DA-blocks-to-be-received-out…
MitchTurner Nov 14, 2024
cfd1a71
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into feature/allow-DA-blocks-to…
MitchTurner Nov 17, 2024
d983891
Resolve logical conflicts from merge
MitchTurner Nov 17, 2024
4c2b844
Merge branch 'master' into feature/allow-DA-blocks-to-be-received-out…
MitchTurner Nov 17, 2024
48fe978
Merge branch 'master' into feature/allow-DA-blocks-to-be-received-out…
MitchTurner Nov 18, 2024
b578a8e
Merge branch 'master' into feature/allow-DA-blocks-to-be-received-out…
MitchTurner Nov 19, 2024
7ca55c7
Ignore entire batches with blocks not in the unrecorded_blocks
MitchTurner Nov 19, 2024
6ac41de
Add comments to explain unexpected behavior
MitchTurner Nov 19, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -267,16 +267,14 @@ pub fn draw_profit(
const ACTUAL_PROFIT_COLOR: RGBColor = BLACK;
const PROJECTED_PROFIT_COLOR: RGBColor = RED;
const PESSIMISTIC_BLOCK_COST_COLOR: RGBColor = BLUE;
let actual_profit_gwei: Vec<_> = actual_profit
.into_iter()
.map(|x| x / ONE_GWEI as i128)
.collect();
let actual_profit_gwei: Vec<_> =
actual_profit.iter().map(|x| x / ONE_GWEI as i128).collect();
netrome marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
let projected_profit_gwei: Vec<_> = projected_profit
.into_iter()
.iter()
.map(|x| x / ONE_GWEI as i128)
.collect();
let pessimistic_block_costs_gwei: Vec<_> = pessimistic_block_costs
.into_iter()
.iter()
.map(|x| x / ONE_GWEI as u128)
.collect();
let min = *std::cmp::min(
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -103,7 +103,6 @@ impl Simulator {
// Increase to make the da price change faster
max_da_gas_price_change_percent: 10,
total_da_rewards_excess: 0,
da_recorded_block_height: 0,
// Change to adjust the cost per byte of the DA on block 0
latest_da_cost_per_byte: 0,
projected_total_da_cost: 0,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -162,9 +161,8 @@ impl Simulator {
// Update DA blocks on the occasion there is one
if let Some((range, cost)) = da_block {
for height in range.to_owned() {
updater
.update_da_record_data(height..(height + 1), cost)
.unwrap();
let block_heights: Vec<u32> = (height..(height) + 1).collect();
updater.update_da_record_data(&block_heights, cost).unwrap();
actual_costs.push(updater.latest_known_total_da_cost_excess)
}
}
Expand Down
83 changes: 30 additions & 53 deletions crates/fuel-gas-price-algorithm/src/v1.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,10 +3,7 @@ use std::{
cmp::max,
collections::BTreeMap,
num::NonZeroU64,
ops::{
Div,
Range,
},
ops::Div,
};

#[cfg(test)]
Expand All @@ -16,14 +13,12 @@ mod tests;
pub enum Error {
#[error("Skipped L2 block update: expected {expected:?}, got {got:?}")]
SkippedL2Block { expected: u32, got: u32 },
#[error("Skipped DA block update: expected {expected:?}, got {got:?}")]
SkippedDABlock { expected: u32, got: u32 },
#[error("Could not calculate cost per byte: {bytes:?} bytes, {cost:?} cost")]
CouldNotCalculateCostPerByte { bytes: u128, cost: u128 },
#[error("Failed to include L2 block data: {0}")]
FailedTooIncludeL2BlockData(String),
#[error("L2 block expected but not found in unrecorded blocks: {0}")]
L2BlockExpectedNotFound(u32),
#[error("L2 block expected but not found in unrecorded blocks: {height:?}")]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unrelated, but this could be just {height}, not {height:?}. But also I see that we use debug for other messages, so maybe there's a reason.

L2BlockExpectedNotFound { height: u32 },
}

// TODO: separate exec gas price and DA gas price into newtypes for clarity
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -131,8 +126,6 @@ pub struct AlgorithmUpdaterV1 {
pub max_da_gas_price_change_percent: u16,
/// The cumulative reward from the DA portion of the gas price
pub total_da_rewards_excess: u128,
/// The height of the last L2 block recorded on the DA chain
pub da_recorded_block_height: u32,
/// The cumulative cost of recording L2 blocks on the DA chain as of the last recorded block
pub latest_known_total_da_cost_excess: u128,
/// The predicted cost of recording L2 blocks on the DA chain as of the last L2 block
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -307,11 +300,11 @@ impl core::ops::Deref for ClampedPercentage {
impl AlgorithmUpdaterV1 {
pub fn update_da_record_data(
&mut self,
height_range: Range<u32>,
range_cost: u128,
heights: &[u32],
netrome marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
recording_cost: u128,
) -> Result<(), Error> {
if !height_range.is_empty() {
self.da_block_update(height_range, range_cost)?;
if !heights.is_empty() {
self.da_block_update(heights, recording_cost)?;
self.recalculate_projected_cost();
}
Ok(())
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -514,48 +507,32 @@ impl AlgorithmUpdaterV1 {

fn da_block_update(
&mut self,
height_range: Range<u32>,
range_cost: u128,
heights: &[u32],
recording_cost: u128,
) -> Result<(), Error> {
let expected = self.da_recorded_block_height.saturating_add(1);
let first = height_range.start;
if first != expected {
Err(Error::SkippedDABlock {
expected,
got: first,
})
} else {
let last = height_range.end.saturating_sub(1);
let range_bytes = self.drain_l2_block_bytes_for_range(height_range)?;
let new_cost_per_byte: u128 = range_cost.checked_div(range_bytes).ok_or(
Error::CouldNotCalculateCostPerByte {
bytes: range_bytes,
cost: range_cost,
},
)?;
self.da_recorded_block_height = last;
let new_da_block_cost = self
.latest_known_total_da_cost_excess
.saturating_add(range_cost);
self.latest_known_total_da_cost_excess = new_da_block_cost;
self.latest_da_cost_per_byte = new_cost_per_byte;
Ok(())
}
let recorded_bytes = self.drain_l2_block_bytes_for_range(heights)?;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe just:

Suggested change
let recorded_bytes = self.drain_l2_block_bytes_for_range(heights)?;
let recorded_bytes = self.drain_l2_block_bytes(heights)?;

It'll save us from renaming the function when we change the datatype again. However, the intention here could be to not relate to the Range<T>, but to the "range" as arbitrary "noun".

Either way, just a small detail.

let new_cost_per_byte: u128 = recording_cost.checked_div(recorded_bytes).ok_or(
Error::CouldNotCalculateCostPerByte {
bytes: recorded_bytes,
cost: recording_cost,
},
)?;
let new_da_block_cost = self
.latest_known_total_da_cost_excess
.saturating_add(recording_cost);
self.latest_known_total_da_cost_excess = new_da_block_cost;
self.latest_da_cost_per_byte = new_cost_per_byte;
Ok(())
}

fn drain_l2_block_bytes_for_range(
&mut self,
height_range: Range<u32>,
) -> Result<u128, Error> {
fn drain_l2_block_bytes_for_range(&mut self, heights: &[u32]) -> Result<u128, Error> {
netrome marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
let mut total: u128 = 0;
for expected_height in height_range {
let (actual_height, bytes) = self
.unrecorded_blocks
.pop_first()
.ok_or(Error::L2BlockExpectedNotFound(expected_height))?;
if actual_height != expected_height {
return Err(Error::L2BlockExpectedNotFound(expected_height));
}
for expected_height in heights {
let bytes = self.unrecorded_blocks.remove(expected_height).ok_or(
Error::L2BlockExpectedNotFound {
height: *expected_height,
},
)?;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we really need an error here? We could log error here and use 0=)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's up to us. If this errors we have a serious problem with our code.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the committer has problems and submits several bundles per same height(they can in theory because they do re-bundle), it will break the node.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That can't happen if it's finalized before they report to us.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've been thinking about the (very unlikely) case that our gas price metadata is "ahead" of the chain on restart. This could in theory result in a bunch of the blocks being missing from the unrecorded_blocks. At that point we might have the da_committer reporting those blocks again.

Since the precision of the algorithm isn't that important, I think the simplest solution would be to just ignore re-reported blocks.

In that case we don't want it throwing an error here. So I'm going to change this.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmmmmmmmm.... Well it's kinda weird.

We don't get the values for each committed block, we just get a value for the entire bundle.

This means, for example if the unrecorded_blocks are just [(8, 100)] (height, bytes) and the committed blocks come back and they are for heights [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] with cost 10_000, then we will remove the 8 and subtract 100 from the total and then add 10_000 to the total! Even though it's likely that the costs for 1-7 are already accounted for.

We can take 1/8 of the 10_000, which would be better than nothing, but definitely inaccurate.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In terms of the algorithm, I think the best approach here is to ignore the batch. The problem is if it ever occurs, we will carry those unrecorded_blocks forever. It's fine from the algorithm's perspective because the error will become negligible pretty quickly.

Copy link
Member Author

@MitchTurner MitchTurner Nov 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The problem is if it ever occurs, we will carry those unrecorded_blocks forever.

Nevermind. We can both remove the blocks and ignore. I think that's the best.

total = total.saturating_add(bytes as u128);
}
Ok(total)
Expand All @@ -566,7 +543,7 @@ impl AlgorithmUpdaterV1 {
let projection_portion: u128 = self
.unrecorded_blocks
.iter()
.map(|(_, &bytes)| (bytes as u128))
.map(|(_, &bytes)| bytes as u128)
netrome marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
.fold(0_u128, |acc, n| acc.saturating_add(n))
.saturating_mul(self.latest_da_cost_per_byte);
self.projected_total_da_cost = self
Expand Down
8 changes: 0 additions & 8 deletions crates/fuel-gas-price-algorithm/src/v1/tests.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ pub struct UpdaterBuilder {
l2_block_capacity_threshold: u8,

total_rewards: u128,
da_recorded_block_height: u32,
da_cost_per_byte: u128,
project_total_cost: u128,
latest_known_total_cost: u128,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -63,7 +62,6 @@ impl UpdaterBuilder {
l2_block_capacity_threshold: 50,

total_rewards: 0,
da_recorded_block_height: 0,
da_cost_per_byte: 0,
project_total_cost: 0,
latest_known_total_cost: 0,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -133,11 +131,6 @@ impl UpdaterBuilder {
self
}

fn with_da_recorded_block_height(mut self, da_recorded_block_height: u32) -> Self {
self.da_recorded_block_height = da_recorded_block_height;
self
}

fn with_da_cost_per_byte(mut self, da_cost_per_byte: u128) -> Self {
self.da_cost_per_byte = da_cost_per_byte;
self
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -184,7 +177,6 @@ impl UpdaterBuilder {
l2_block_fullness_threshold_percent: self.l2_block_capacity_threshold.into(),
total_da_rewards_excess: self.total_rewards,

da_recorded_block_height: self.da_recorded_block_height,
latest_da_cost_per_byte: self.da_cost_per_byte,
projected_total_da_cost: self.project_total_cost,
latest_known_total_da_cost_excess: self.latest_known_total_cost,
Expand Down
Loading
Loading