Skip to content

Findings Summary Report #5140

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 30, 2025
Merged

Findings Summary Report #5140

merged 6 commits into from
Jul 30, 2025

Conversation

jperson1
Copy link
Contributor

@jperson1 jperson1 commented Jul 28, 2025

Findings Summary Report Generation

No issue?

Changes:

  1. Findings Summary Report Downloads
    • Accessed via search while logged in with privileged access
    • Excel sheet with one row per finding, broken into sheets by ALN. See also the daily reports from 2024 while search was down
    • Limited to 4000 rows by default
  2. Mixin for ensuring federal access (include_private)
  3. Minor changes to the redissemination management command

Testing

  1. Switch to this branch and run normally
  2. Have some disseminated data, including materialized view
  3. Ensure your login has tribal access (users_userpermission table)
    • Can use the admin panel and add an entry for yourself in "User permissions"
  4. Make a search with less than 4000 results
    • I used a year or two and MD state
  5. Download the findings summary report
  6. Make sure it looks right and doesn't take too long. Too long is above 15s, perhaps

Screenshot:

image

PR Checklist: Submitter

  • Link to an issue if possible. If there’s no issue, describe what your branch does. Even if there is an issue, a brief description in the PR is still useful.
  • List any special steps reviewers have to follow to test the PR. For example, adding a local environment variable, creating a local test file, etc.
  • For extra credit, submit a screen recording like this one.
  • Make sure you’ve merged main into your branch shortly before creating the PR. (You should also be merging main into your branch regularly during development.)
  • Make sure you’ve accounted for any migrations. When you’re about to create the PR, bring up the application locally and then run git status | grep migrations. If there are any results, you probably need to add them to the branch for the PR. Your PR should have only one new migration file for each of the component apps, except in rare circumstances; you may need to delete some and re-run python manage.py makemigrations to reduce the number to one. (Also, unless in exceptional circumstances, your PR should not delete any migration files.)
  • Make sure that whatever feature you’re adding has tests that cover the feature. This includes test coverage to make sure that the previous workflow still works, if applicable.
  • Make sure the full-submission.cy.js Cypress test passes, if applicable.
  • Do manual testing locally. Our tests are not good enough yet to allow us to skip this step. If that’s not applicable for some reason, check this box.
  • Verify that no Git surgery was necessary, or, if it was necessary at any point, repeat the testing after it’s finished.
  • Once a PR is merged, keep an eye on it until it’s deployed to dev, and do enough testing on dev to verify that it deployed successfully, the feature works as expected, and the happy path for the broad feature area (such as submission) still works.
  • Ensure that prior to merging, the working branch is up to date with main and the terraform plan is what you expect.

PR Checklist: Reviewer

  • Pull the branch to your local environment and run make docker-clean; make docker-first-run && docker compose up; then run docker compose exec web /bin/bash -c "python manage.py test"
  • Manually test out the changes locally, or check this box to verify that it wasn’t applicable in this case.
  • Check that the PR has appropriate tests. Look out for changes in HTML/JS/JSON Schema logic that may need to be captured in Python tests even though the logic isn’t in Python.
  • Verify that no Git surgery is necessary at any point (such as during a merge party), or, if it was, repeat the testing after it’s finished.

The larger the PR, the stricter we should be about these points.

Pre Merge Checklist: Merger

  • Ensure that prior to approving, the terraform plan is what we expect it to be. -/+ resource "null_resource" "cors_header" should be destroying and recreating its self and ~ resource "cloudfoundry_app" "clamav_api" might be updating its sha256 for the fac-file-scanner and fac-av-${ENV} by default.
  • Ensure that the branch is up to date with main.
  • Ensure that a terraform plan has been recently generated for the pull request.

jadudm and others added 4 commits July 24, 2025 17:17
We've been asked for something like this forever.

We've had the code for over a year.

This is a "v1." Perhaps we only generate it for Feds.

Pushing it as a "what if," so we can discuss it.
This has been requested for a long time. We had most of the logic.

Performant enough with a few thousand results.
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Terraform plan for meta

No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.
No changes. Your infrastructure matches the configuration.

Terraform has compared your real infrastructure against your configuration
and found no differences, so no changes are needed.

✅ Plan applied in Deploy to Development and Meta Environments #1050

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Terraform plan for dev

Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 1 to destroy.
Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
-/+ destroy and then create replacement

Terraform will perform the following actions:

  # module.dev.module.cors.null_resource.cors_header must be replaced
-/+ resource "null_resource" "cors_header" {
!~      id       = "******************" -> (known after apply)
!~      triggers = { # forces replacement
!~          "always_run" = "2025-07-29T14:56:26Z" -> (known after apply)
        }
    }

Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 1 to destroy.

✅ Plan applied in Deploy to Development and Meta Environments #1050

I believe, based on unit testing and manual testing, that this will
protect the code in question. These are both cases where I almost want a
bare `except: pass`, but I've chosen not to.

We'll need to keep our eyes on this, but it looks good.
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is not up to date with main. Please merge main into this brach or rebase this branch onto main. This PR should not be approved until all status checks pass. If you see this message, please rerun all status checks before merging.

Copy link
Contributor

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Branch Rate Health
. 100% 100%
api 98% 86%
api.serializers 97% 88%
api.views 91% 100%
audit 95% 80%
audit.cross_validation 97% 86%
audit.fixtures 84% 50%
audit.formlib 40% 0%
audit.intakelib 89% 83%
audit.intakelib.checks 92% 85%
audit.intakelib.common 98% 82%
audit.intakelib.transforms 100% 95%
audit.management.commands 78% 17%
audit.migrations 100% 100%
audit.models 91% 69%
audit.templatetags 100% 100%
audit.views 72% 50%
census_historical_migration 96% 65%
census_historical_migration.migrations 100% 100%
census_historical_migration.sac_general_lib 92% 84%
census_historical_migration.transforms 95% 90%
census_historical_migration.workbooklib 68% 69%
config 78% 37%
curation 99% 100%
curation.curationlib 83% 50%
curation.migrations 100% 100%
dissemination 89% 69%
dissemination.analytics 27% 0%
dissemination.forms 79% 30%
dissemination.migrations 97% 25%
dissemination.models 100% 100%
dissemination.report_generation 21% 0%
dissemination.report_generation.excel 32% 0%
dissemination.searchlib 59% 41%
dissemination.templatetags 48% 0%
dissemination.views 66% 43%
djangooidc 53% 38%
djangooidc.tests 100% 94%
report_submission 100% 95%
report_submission.migrations 100% 100%
report_submission.templatetags 74% 100%
report_submission.views 78% 62%
support 94% 75%
support.migrations 100% 100%
support.models 90% 50%
tools 98% 50%
users 95% 86%
users.fixtures 100% 83%
users.management 100% 100%
users.management.commands 100% 100%
users.migrations 100% 100%
Summary 88% (21167 / 23997) 68% (2567 / 3754)

@jadudm jadudm added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 30, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 8fe58f1 Jul 30, 2025
18 checks passed
@jadudm jadudm deleted the jadudm/findings-summary branch July 30, 2025 13:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants