Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid lint fail on PR from forks #87

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

agateau-gg
Copy link
Collaborator

Do not run GGShield on PR from forks: it fails because GITGUARDIAN_API_KEY is not set in this case.

Do not run GGShield on PR from forks: it fails because GITGUARDIAN_API_KEY
is not set in this case.
@agateau-gg agateau-gg added the skip-changelog No changelog check in the CI label Jan 10, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (32807ed) 92.52% compared to head (bc46666) 92.52%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #87   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.52%   92.52%           
=======================================
  Files           6        6           
  Lines         642      642           
=======================================
  Hits          594      594           
  Misses         48       48           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 92.52% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fnareoh fnareoh merged commit f48e200 into master Jan 10, 2024
16 of 17 checks passed
@fnareoh fnareoh deleted the agateau/no-ggshield-on-forks branch January 10, 2024 13:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip-changelog No changelog check in the CI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants