-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
fix(retail): add region tag for nodejs - Update search with query expansion #4119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix(retail): add region tag for nodejs - Update search with query expansion #4119
Conversation
Added region tag to simply search query for code snippet update in the documentation.
Update search-simple-query.js for code snippet updates in retail/commerce documentation.
…h-pagination-sample fix(retail): add region tag for JS - Search_With_Pagination sample
Here is the summary of changes. You are about to add 1 region tag.
This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @rebeccaellis, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on improving the discoverability and documentation integration of an existing Node.js retail sample. By adding specific region tags, the code snippet can be automatically included in relevant documentation, enhancing the overall developer experience for users looking to implement search with query expansion.
Highlights
- Documentation/Sample Tagging: I've added
[START]
and[END]
region tags to thesearch-with-query-expansion-spec.js
sample. This helps in automatically extracting and publishing code snippets for documentation, making the sample more discoverable and usable in Google Cloud documentation.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds region tags to the search-with-query-expansion-spec.js
sample file. The tags are correctly named and placed to create a self-contained, runnable sample. My review provides suggestions to refactor the code within this new sample region to improve its overall quality, readability, and alignment with Node.js best practices.
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ | |||
// limitations under the License. | |||
|
|||
'use strict'; | |||
|
|||
// [START retail_search_for_products_with_query_expansion_specification] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that this code block is being exposed as a sample, it would be beneficial to refactor it for clarity and to align with common JavaScript best practices.
Here are a few suggestions:
-
Hoist
require
statements: Therequire('@google-cloud/retail')
call on line 19 should be at the top level of the module, outside themain
function. This is standard Node.js practice for better readability and dependency management. -
Simplify function structure: The
main
function defines and immediately calls an innerasync
functioncallSearch
. This wrapper is redundant and can be removed by moving its logic directly intomain
, simplifying the control flow. -
Improve error handling: The
process.on('unhandledRejection', ...)
can be replaced with a more explicit.catch()
on themain()
call. This would also allow the error handling logic to be moved outside the sample's region tags, which is a common and recommended pattern for samples.
Here is an example of a refactored structure:
'use strict';
const {SearchServiceClient} = require('@google-cloud/retail');
// [START retail_search_for_products_with_query_expansion_specification]
async function main() {
const retailClient = new SearchServiceClient();
// ... all logic from callSearch ...
}
// [END retail_search_for_products_with_query_expansion_specification]
main().catch(err => {
console.error(err.message);
process.exitCode = 1;
});
These changes would significantly improve the readability and maintainability of the sample.
Description
Fixes #415382524
Note: Before submitting a pull request, please open an issue for discussion if you are not associated with Google.
Checklist
npm test
(see Testing)npm run lint
(see Style)GoogleCloudPlatform/nodejs-docs-samples
. Not a fork.