Feature/angle vs height

[HarrisonKramer]

Angle vs. Height Analysis

Represents an analysis of incident angle vs. image height by varying through all pupil/field coordinates for a given image field/pupil point.

Example:

import optiland.backend as be
from optiland.analysis import FieldIncidentAngleVsHeight
from optiland.optic import Optic

lens = Optic(name = 'Simple Scan Optic') 
lens.add_wavelength(value=0.63, is_primary=True) 
lens.add_surface(index=0, thickness=be.inf, comment='telecentric beam')
lens.add_surface(index=1, thickness=153.2, is_stop=True, comment='scan mirror')
lens.add_surface(index=2, thickness=5, radius=be.inf, material='N-SF11', comment='PCX front surface')
lens.add_surface(index=3, thickness=157.8, radius=-122.3, comment='PCX back surface')
lens.add_surface(index=4, comment='image plane') 
lens.set_aperture(aperture_type="EPD", value=3)
lens.set_field_type(field_type='angle')
lens.add_field(y=0)
lens.add_field(y=7)
_ = lens.draw()

angle_vs_height = FieldIncidentAngleVsHeight(lens)
angle_vs_height.view()

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 94.87179% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
optiland/analysis/angle_vs_height.py	94.82%	6 Missing ⚠️

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #215      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.51%   95.51%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         162      163       +1     
  Lines        9016     9133     +117     
==========================================
+ Hits         8612     8723     +111     
- Misses        404      410       +6     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
optiland/analysis/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
optiland/analysis/angle_vs_height.py	94.82% <94.82%> (ø)

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.