Entity Refactor (part 0) #2211
Merged
Entity Refactor (part 0) #2211
+13
−13
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is comitted separately because it should not have any functional changes. Do not skip this in a `git bisect`, but do not revert this when testing commits for functional changes.
The EntityStorage/OM mechanism for data access is being replaced. Specifying 'es:app' in puter.js calls will allow the ES/OM mechanism and its replacement to be tested together to check for regressions. When the replacement is done, we can change 'es:app' to the new service name.
Contributor
Author
|
API Test is broken again, but puter-js test which is relevant to this change passes, so I am merging this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No significant changes in this PR - I just want to get my first couple of commits in
mainin caseApps.jsis going to have more modifications in the near future so there's no conflict because of the linter.Subsequent PR will introduce a new service that will eventually replace
es:app.