make opposite Is1Natural definitionally involutive #1969
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Ali Caglayan <[email protected]>
jdchristensen
approved these changes
May 27, 2024
Signed-off-by: Ali Caglayan <[email protected]>
|
Turns out we don't get definitionally involutive associators and unitors since we are taking inverses there. I have updated the tests to show the current state of the opposite involutions. This isn't strictly needed for #1929 anyway. |
Co-authored-by: Dan Christensen <[email protected]>
Alizter
commented
May 27, 2024
Signed-off-by: Ali Caglayan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ali Caglayan <[email protected]>
|
LGTM. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Carry out the suggestion in #1961. This will allow for more of the data of a monoidal category or (2,1)-category to be definitionally involutive.