Skip to content

nmos_cl symbols for xschem updated #600

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KrzysztofHerman
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #594
Port order changed for xschem symbols.

@KrzysztofHerman KrzysztofHerman changed the title nmos_cl symbols for xscham updated nmos_cl symbols for xschem updated Jul 16, 2025
@d-m-bailey
Copy link
Contributor

d-m-bailey commented Jul 16, 2025

@KrzysztofHerman Looking at the xschem documentation here, it appears that the pinnumber attribute is only used for packaged devices (tEDAx netlists, see page 54). For spice netlists, the attribute is sim_pinnumber, but that only works if all pins have a sim_pinnumber attribute (as far as I understand).
The propag attribute (explained on page 56), specifies highlighting through the device. Originally, the second pin (index 1) had propag=1 which would do nothing. With this change, when the net connected to the first pin vdd (index 0) is highlighted, the highlighting will be propagated to the pin with index 1, vss. I don't think this wanted.

I suggest removing the pinnumber and propag properties.

Note, I haven't tested any of the above, but that is my understanding from the documetation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants