-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 351
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
review: feat: read jvm version for default compliance level #6043
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
I think that's indeed a better default, but it's probably something we want to at least highlight in the next release? I also don't think we need to catch any exception around the version code, as it should work on Java 10 onwards and we're targeting Java 17. |
Hmm, we could start collecting common answers and important behaviors on the website. |
Good idea. But maybe we can also improve the in-code documentation (e.g. add a comment to the |
Co-authored-by: Hannes Greule <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Maybe the current JVM version is a better default compared to 8 or?