ENH: Bump Python package version to 0.22.0

[thewtex]

And itk Python dep to 5.4.2.

@N-Dekker this is a step for publishing a new Python package version. And it allows us to test recent CI configuration improvements.

[N-Dekker]

SuperElastix/elastix still supports ITK 5.4.1, so I guess it might as well say "itk~=5.4.1", right?

[dzenanz]

There are no python packages generated for 5.4.1.

[N-Dekker]

Thanks @dzenanz But if I understand correctly, the expression "itk~=5.4.1" would match both 5.4.1 and 5.4.2, even if 5.4.1 doesn't exist 😸

[thewtex]

Since we are building against itk 5.4.2, Bumping the compatible release specification is a good idea:

https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/version-specifiers/#compatible-release

There are not necessarily binary compatibility issues, but this is a good practice.

[N-Dekker]

Thanks Matt!

I'm sorry I don't know how to review these 1000+ code changes 🤷 Any suggestion?

[thewtex]

@N-Dekker it is not necessary to validate all the changes in pixi.lock or pnpm-lock.yaml :-)

[dzenanz]

LGTM 😄

[N-Dekker]

it is not necessary to validate all the changes in pixi.lock or pnpm-lock.yaml :-)

Thanks, Matt. Are these two files then generated fully automatically?

[N-Dekker]

As far as I can see, all CI checks pass now, except for "Build / py-dev / test-linux-notebooks (pull_request)", at https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITKElastix/actions/runs/13738452046/job/38427626120?pr=326 saying:

RuntimeError: /work/build/cp39-cp39-linux_x86_64/_deps/elx-src/Core/Main/itkElastixRegistrationMethod.hxx:389:
ITK ERROR: ElastixRegistrationMethod(0x55650d993740): Internal elastix error: See elastix log (use LogToConsoleOn() or LogToFileOn()).
----------------------------- Captured stdout call -----------------------------
WARNING: The parameter "FixedInternalImagePixelType", requested at entry number 0, does not exist at all.
  The default value "float" is used instead.
WARNING: The parameter "MovingInternalImagePixelType", requested at entry number 0, does not exist at all.
  The default value "float" is used instead.
Installing all components.
InstallingComponents was successful.

ELASTIX version: 5.2.0
Git revision SHA: df075e8e1fd1a647cdda2c1e5a8a6febd9074ad0
Git revision date: Fri Feb 21 16:19:08 2025 -0500
Command line options from ElastixBase:
-threads  unspecified, so all available threads are used
WARNING: The parameter "UseDirectionCosines", requested at entry number 0, does not exist at all.
  The default value "true" is used instead.

WARNING: The option "UseDirectionCosines" was not found in your parameter file.
  From elastix 4.8 it defaults to true!
This may change the behavior of your registrations considerably.

Command line options from TransformBase:
-t0       unspecified, so no initial transform used
WARNING: The parameter "BSplineTransformSplineOrder", requested at entry number 0, does not exist at all.
  The default value "3" is used instead.

Reading images...
Reading images took 0 ms.

WARNING: the fixed pyramid schedule is not fully specified!
  A default pyramid schedule is used.
WARNING: the moving pyramid schedule is not fully specified!
  A default pyramid schedule is used.

itk::ExceptionObject (0x556505c35940)
Location: "unknown" 
File: /work/build/cp39-cp39-linux_x86_64/_deps/elx-src/Components/Metrics/VarianceOverLastDimension/elxVarianceOverLastDimensionMetric.hxx
Line: 83
Description: ITK ERROR: VarianceOverLastDimensionMetric(0x556505c33d80): 
ERROR: the direction cosines matrix of the fixed image is invalid!

  The VarianceOverLastDimensionMetric expects the last dimension to represent
  time and therefore requires a direction cosines matrix of the form:
       [ . . 0 ]
  dc = [ . . 0 ]
       [ 0 0 1 ]

But that's an issue you reported before: #291 So let's merge now! Thanks again Matt!

[thewtex]

Are these two files then generated fully automatically?

👍 yes

Thanks @N-Dekker !

[N-Dekker]

@thewtex Can you please explain how to generate those files automatically? Maybe tomorrow... 😃