-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
295 addget fast filters integration #305
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…nd list complete for filters. Moving to testing...
Target CPP Coverage: 69.7103% Target Python Coverage: 97.94% |
…com/IntelLabs/vdms into 295-addget-fast-filters-integration
Target CPP Coverage: 69.7103% Target Python Coverage: 97.94% |
Target CPP Coverage: 69.7103% Target Python Coverage: 97.94% |
Target CPP Coverage: 69.7103% Target Python Coverage: 97.94% |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Pending @s-gobriel input
Co-authored-by: Chaunte W. Lacewell <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think in the develop branch filter_list_all_names() is already exposed as an external api. this will resolve with merge. but otherwise the create and find filter api looks good to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Must have not synched my local with it correctly, my bad.
Target CPP Coverage: 70.8772% Target Python Coverage: 97.94% |
Initial integration of add/find/list filters