Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Simplified Chinese Translations #737

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: jgrpp
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

WenSimEHRP
Copy link
Contributor

@WenSimEHRP WenSimEHRP commented Aug 30, 2024

@Mikhail-YellowBegonia thought of an alternate translation for routefinding restriction slots.

Their approach was to use "tokens", "token groups", and "vehicle have/does not have token " instead of "slots" and "vehicle is/is not in slot " as signal tokens are the referrent of routefinding restriction slots in real-life railways.

The verbs used were changed correspondingly e.g. aquire -> collect, release-> return.

This still needs further discussion. I am not sure whether this change should be merged, and I need more opinions, especially from @JGRennison .

@JGRennison
Copy link
Owner

I'm happy to defer to your judgement on the correct word to use.
I obviously can't comment on which translation is better or easier to understand for Chinese users.

@WenSimEHRP
Copy link
Contributor Author

WenSimEHRP commented Aug 31, 2024 via email

调整了 restirct slot 相关的译名,由槽位改为路签
@TransshipmentEnvoy
Copy link

My concern is that there is no explicit English text "token" at the moment, and if "token" is added later (maybe in the shunting system if that is possible), then there will be a problem.

@TransshipmentEnvoy
Copy link

I am also curious why "slots" were used instead of "tokens" for the English text back then. What was the motivation behind this?

@WenSimEHRP
Copy link
Contributor Author

This probably needs an update.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants