Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added support for CuArray via Adapt.jl #67

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RainerHeintzmann
Copy link
Contributor

This second attempt, uses a very light-weight implementation to add CuArray support to ShiftedArrays.jl.
It is based on using an Extension Package, such that ShiftedArrays does not drag in any extra packages, but if CUDA.jl is present, the adaptation is used.
Note that the show() function was specified by CuArrays preventing errors via the @allowscalar macro.
The tests were extended to CuArray usage, but this has to be enabled manually in the runtests.jl file.

ext/CUDASupportExt.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ext/CUDASupportExt.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ext/CUDASupportExt.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 19 to 24
function Base.show(io::IO, mm::MIME"text/plain", cs::CircShiftedArray)
CUDA.@allowscalar invoke(Base.show, Tuple{IO, typeof(mm), AbstractArray}, io, mm, cs)
end

function Base.show(io::IO, mm::MIME"text/plain", cs::ShiftedArray)
CUDA.@allowscalar invoke(Base.show, Tuple{IO, typeof(mm), AbstractArray}, io, mm, cs)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This part makes me a little uncomfortable (it's type-piracy in some sense), maybe it's best to remove it for the time being and accept that showing errors and we can see how to fix it later. How do other wrapping packages do it? Should we maybe just depend on GPUArraysCore and take @allowscalar from there?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree. I will commend this out for the time being and test your other great suggestions,

Comment on lines +3 to +7
use_cuda = false; # set this to true to test ShiftedArrays for the CuArray datatype
if (use_cuda)
using CUDA
CUDA.allowscalar(true); # needed for some of the comparisons
end
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we could use https://github.com/JuliaGPU/GPUArrays.jl/blob/4278412a6b9b1d859c290232a9f8223eb4416d1e/lib/JLArrays/src/JLArrays.jl#L6 to test without a GPU? Also, maybe we can try and use @allowscalar to selectively allow scalar indexing where it's needed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did not want CUDA to be a dependency on testing, if we move @allowscalar outside the if clause, we would need to always have CUDA loaded for testing. If JLArrays.jl is a lightweight way of doing this, then this may be a good idea.

@piever
Copy link
Collaborator

piever commented Dec 20, 2023

Thanks for the PR, I've left a review with some suggestions. I'll be traveling for the holidays so I might be slow in responding for the next couple of weeks.

@RainerHeintzmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

... there were a couple of typos. Now the show adaptation is commented out and the typos were fixed. The tests run fine. Seems we are getting closer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants