Build Julia HTML manual in regression tests #2724
Conversation
mortenpi
added
Type: Maintenance
Skip Changelog
| # the current Documenter, acting as a regression test. | ||
|
|
||
| # Terminate the script early if we see any non-zero error codes | ||
| set -e |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You do you of course, but if I may add my two cents: while I also tend to automatically write such things in shell scripts, these days I try to ask myself "why not write this in Julia" ;-). So many edge cases vanish...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually, I think this is a very fair point, and I also generally tend follow that philosophy. I think what just happened here was that at first I was like "this should be like 3 shell commands", but then the complexity silently crept in 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hehe I have been in exactly that situation soooo many times ;-)
| set -e | ||
|
|
||
| # Location if this bash script | ||
| SCRIPT_DIR=$( cd -- "$( dirname -- "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" &> /dev/null && pwd ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
trivial in julia... :-)
| # Terminate the script early if we see any non-zero error codes | ||
| set -e | ||
|
|
||
| # Location if this bash script |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| # Location if this bash script | |
| # Location of this bash script |
| SCRIPT_DIR=$( cd -- "$( dirname -- "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" &> /dev/null && pwd ) | ||
| DOCUMENTER_SRC=$(dirname $(dirname "$SCRIPT_DIR")) | ||
|
|
||
| # Figure out the Julia binary we use. This can be passed on the command line, but |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should be trivial if this script was just run in Julia?
| TMP=$(mktemp -d) | ||
| cd "$TMP" | ||
| echo "Running in: $PWD" | ||
| # .. which we also want to clean up when the script exits | ||
| trap "rm -r $TMP" EXIT |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
mktempdir() do tmpdir
cd(tmpdir)
run(`git clone ...`)
end| ${{ runner.os }}-test- | ||
| ${{ runner.os }}- | ||
| - name: "Regressions test" | ||
| run: ./.github/scripts/julia-manual-regression-test.sh |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| run: ./.github/scripts/julia-manual-regression-test.sh | |
| run: julia ./.github/scripts/julia-manual-regression-test.jl |
| - uses: actions/cache@v4 | ||
| env: | ||
| cache-name: cache-artifacts | ||
| with: | ||
| path: ~/.julia/artifacts | ||
| key: ${{ runner.os }}-test-${{ env.cache-name }}-${{ hashFiles('**/Project.toml') }} | ||
| restore-keys: | | ||
| ${{ runner.os }}-test-${{ env.cache-name }}- | ||
| ${{ runner.os }}-test- | ||
| ${{ runner.os }}- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can't this just use julia-actions/cache ?
| - uses: actions/cache@v4 | |
| env: | |
| cache-name: cache-artifacts | |
| with: | |
| path: ~/.julia/artifacts | |
| key: ${{ runner.os }}-test-${{ env.cache-name }}-${{ hashFiles('**/Project.toml') }} | |
| restore-keys: | | |
| ${{ runner.os }}-test-${{ env.cache-name }}- | |
| ${{ runner.os }}-test- | |
| ${{ runner.os }}- | |
| - uses: julia-actions/cache@v2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This makes sense. I think we should update the other places in the regression tests workflow too.
No description provided.