Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🤖 [master] Bump the LinearAlgebra stdlib from e7da19f to 2a1696a #57347

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DilumAluthgeBot
Copy link
Contributor

Stdlib: LinearAlgebra
URL: https://github.com/JuliaLang/LinearAlgebra.jl.git
Stdlib branch: master
Julia branch: master
Old commit: e7da19f
New commit: 2a1696a
Julia version: 1.13.0-DEV
LinearAlgebra version: 1.12.0(Does not match)
Bump invoked by: @ViralBShah
Powered by: BumpStdlibs.jl

Diff: JuliaLang/LinearAlgebra.jl@e7da19f...2a1696a

$ git log --oneline e7da19f..2a1696a
2a1696a Explicitly declare type constructor imports (#1196)
101f766 Added note to BLAS.[g|s]et_num_threads about Apple Accelerate not supporting it  (#1195)
5aca26f Simplify `getproperty` for `Cholesky*` (#1197)
924dda4 remove copy-allocation on accessing `cholesky` factors (`.L`, `.U`) (#1186)
6f02532 Use `BLAS.trsm!` instead of `LAPACK.trtrs!` in left-triangular solves (#1194)

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Member

Doctest failure is real. Fix here: JuliaLang/LinearAlgebra.jl#1199, but perhaps needs more.

Also, I am seeing different output on my machine than what is in the doctest and what the CI version says for C.L:

julia> C.L
3×3 LowerTriangular{Float64, Matrix{Float64}}:
  2.0   ⋅    ⋅ 
  6.0  1.0   ⋅ 
 -8.0  5.0  3.0

@Keno
Copy link
Member

Keno commented Feb 11, 2025

Also, I am seeing different output on my machine than what is in the doctest and what the CI version says for C.L:

Do you have the right version of the stdlib? This was changed in JuliaLang/LinearAlgebra.jl@924dda4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants