Use BaseType.base_numeric_type instead of Base.one to get base scalar type #92
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
x-ref #88, JuliaPhysics/Measurements.jl#155, SymbolicML/DynamicQuantities.jl#40
I've confirmed that with this change as well as the intended change to make
AbstractQuantity <: Number
, DynamicQuantities.jl is now compatible with QuadGK.jl. And this allows me to keepBase.one(::Quantity) -> Quantity
.BaseType.jl should already work for all types I can think of due to the default behavior, but feel free to wait until more interfaces are explicitly declared (e.g., JuliaPhysics/Measurements.jl#155)