This is an example repo for CUDA MatMul implementation. The aim of this repo is to provide some insights in high-performance kernel design for CUDA beginners. Currently, I only provide some implementation examples in
examples/matmul/this
. Contributions for more kernels and other MatMul implementations are highly welcomed.
There is a detailed explanation about the different versions of MatMul kernels in examples/matmul/this
.
-
examples
:-
matmul
: The MatMul implementationsthis-sm90
: The Hopper version Matmulthis-sm80
: The MatMul implemented by this repocublas
: Call CuBLAS for performance testcutlass
: Call CUTLASS for performance testmlir-gen
: The cuda code generated by MLIRtriton
: Call Triton for performance testtvm
: Call Relay+CUTLASS/CuBLAS or TensorIR for performance test
-
atom
: The usage of single intrinsic/instructions -
reduction
: Some reduction kernels for epilogue
-
The current version only achieves on average 70% performance of CuBLAS. I am still working on improving the performance.
The overall performance comparison among Relay, CuBLAS, CUTLASS, TensorIR, Triton, and our implementations. The y-axis is speedup to Relay+CUTLASS.Overall, the geometric mean speedup to Relay+CUTLASS is 1.73x, to TensorIR (1000 tuning trials using MetaSchedule per case) is 1.22x, to CuBLAS is 1.00x, to CUTLASS is 0.999x, to Triton is 1.07x. The 61 shapes are:
No. | M | N | K |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 5376 | 5376 | 2048 |
2 | 5376-128 | 5376 | 2048 |
3 | 5376-2*128 | 5376 | 2048 |
... | ... | ... | ... |
11 | 5376-10*128 | 5376 | 2048 |
12 | 5376+128 | 5376 | 2048 |
13 | 5376+2*128 | 5376 | 2048 |
... | ... | ... | ... |
21 | 5376+10*128 | 5376 | 2048 |
22 | 5376 | 5376-128 | 2048 |
23 | 5376 | 5376-2*128 | 2048 |
... | ... | ... | ... |
31 | 5376 | 5376-10*128 | 2048 |
32 | 5376 | 5376+128 | 2048 |
33 | 5376 | 5376+2*128 | 2048 |
... | ... | ... | ... |
41 | 5376 | 5376+10*128 | 2048 |
42 | 5376 | 5376 | 2048-128 |
43 | 5376 | 5376 | 2048-2*128 |
... | ... | ... | ... |
51 | 5376 | 5376 | 2048-10*128 |
52 | 5376 | 5376 | 2048+128 |
53 | 5376 | 5376 | 2048+2*128 |
... | ... | ... | ... |
61 | 5376 | 5376 | 2048+10*128 |
I also use MLIR to generate MatMul kernels. The generated ones are in examples/matmul/mlir-gen
. The performance to handwritten ones (examples/matmul/this
) is shown as belows. As MLIR generated ones only implement part of the optimizations used by handwritten ones, we call the MLIR generated ones partial
and the handwritten ones full
.
Overall, MLIR generated versions achieve 86% the performance of handwritten kernels.
I plan to implement kernels for other operators such as softmax in future.
There is a plan to use the CuTe interface of CUTLASS to implement high-performance kernels.