-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: implement provably extract LIMIT/OFFSET circuits (Part1) #288
Open
Insun35
wants to merge
10
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
feat/provably-extract-limit-offset
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c661e48
feat: add public inputs for results extraction circuits
Insun35 1ab5337
feat: implement record circuit
Insun35 5fbe4ea
refac: remove redundant const generic
Insun35 e2e58f8
fix: replace acc tree hash input
Insun35 df3364f
feat: add new method to initialize circuit with dummy item
Insun35 ade28f7
chore: remove unused const
Insun35 221abc9
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into feat/provably-extract-limi…
Insun35 716e652
refac: simplify test by using second_indexed_item directly
Insun35 71259d9
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into feat/provably-extract-limi…
Insun35 6de65c2
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into feat/provably-extract-limi…
Insun35 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor: we could replace this with
test_circuit.second_indexed_item
so that we don't have to do thisunwrap_or
everywhere?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed in 716e652.