Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: implement MPT part of generic extraction (Part 1) #385

Merged
merged 183 commits into from
Mar 5, 2025

Conversation

silathdiir
Copy link
Contributor

@silathdiir silathdiir commented Oct 4, 2024

Related issue https://github.com/Lagrange-Labs/zkmr-tracking/issues/265

Design document MPT Extraction

Summary

  • Add the new ColumnGadget and MetadataGadget.
  • Update the leaf circuits of single and mapping variables, and add a new leaf circuit for mapping of mappings.
  • Update the integration test to make the values extraction work for the single and mapping variables (the rows digest check is failed, will update in a further PR).

Base automatically changed from feat/unproven-limit-offset-queries to feat/tabular-queries October 29, 2024 21:06
Base automatically changed from feat/tabular-queries to main November 13, 2024 16:08
@delehef delehef force-pushed the main branch 8 times, most recently from d8cf76a to a9e2b59 Compare January 25, 2025 02:25
@nicholas-mainardi nicholas-mainardi changed the base branch from main to feat/new_extraction_features March 5, 2025 21:02
@nicholas-mainardi nicholas-mainardi merged commit c3c9432 into feat/new_extraction_features Mar 5, 2025
6 checks passed
@nicholas-mainardi nicholas-mainardi deleted the generic-mpt-extraction branch March 5, 2025 21:04
nicholas-mainardi added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2025
- Support extraction of structs from storage MPT
- Support extraction of mappings of mappings from storage MPT
---------

Co-authored-by: Franklin Delehelle <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: nicholas-mainardi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: nikkolasg <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants