Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add common derives for integration #419

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

silathdiir
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@nicholas-mainardi nicholas-mainardi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ impl<'a, C: ContextProvider> NonExistenceInput<'a, C> {
}
}

pub(crate) async fn find_row_node_for_non_existence(
pub async fn find_row_node_for_non_existence(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just curious, why do you need to make this function public to use it in DQ? In my mind everything needed for DQ should be provided by generate_chunks_and_update_tree method

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see, let me check (seems it's used for a old DQ function for rows-tree proving), thanks.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried to check the DQ code, it's also called when creating the rows inputs here.

@silathdiir silathdiir merged commit 33284df into fix/remove_old_query_circuits Dec 13, 2024
4 checks passed
@silathdiir silathdiir deleted the add-derives-for-dq branch December 13, 2024 06:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants