fix(dynamic-form): change example from textarea to code-editor #3199
Conversation
|
Documentation has been published to https://lundalogik.github.io/lime-elements/versions/PR-3199/ |
| fold={true} | ||
| onChange={this.handleTextChange} | ||
| value={this.text} | ||
| ></limel-code-editor>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| ></limel-code-editor>, | |
| />, |
Just a style/taste. But the code looks cleaner and we normally do that when elements don't wrap anything else.
| @@ -45,7 +45,14 @@ export class DynamicFormExample { | |||
|
|
|||
| public render() { | |||
| return [ | |||
| <textarea onChange={this.handleTextChange}>{this.text}</textarea>, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
in the previous version, one could typ inside the textarea and see the results live in the form below. We should make sure that the same thing happens when using the code-editor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the commit type is docs in this case, not fix. Since we are only changing something in the documentations, and not fixing any bugs or problems in the component's code
There was a problem hiding this comment.
let me know if you want help changing the title 😊
| @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ | |||
| textarea { | |||
| limel-code-editor { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| limel-code-editor { | |
| limel-code-editor { | |
paulinewahle
force-pushed
the
dynamic-schema-code-editor
branch
3 times, most recently
from
33be529 to
1b6d8f8
Compare
adrianschmidt
force-pushed
the
main
branch
3 times, most recently
from
197298f to
a0e1088
Compare
|
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
WalkthroughThis pull request updates both the styling and functionality of a dynamic form example. The CSS selector is changed from a standard textarea to a custom limel-code-editor with modifications to its style properties. Additionally, the React component is updated so that the textarea element in the render method is replaced with a limel-code-editor, now preconfigured for JSON editing with properties such as language, lineNumbers, lint, and fold. The event handling remains unchanged. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant FormComponent as DynamicFormExample
participant Editor as limel-code-editor
User ->> Editor: Input/edit JSON content
Editor -->> FormComponent: onChange event triggered
FormComponent ->> Editor: Update the displayed text value
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
adrianschmidt
force-pushed
the
dynamic-schema-code-editor
branch
from
1b6d8f8 to
b8ebf82
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/form/examples/dynamic-form.scss(1 hunks)src/components/form/examples/dynamic-form.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/components/form/examples/dynamic-form.scss
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/components/form/examples/dynamic-form.tsx
[error] 48-55: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Docs / Publish Docs
- GitHub Check: Test
- GitHub Check: Build
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/form/examples/dynamic-form.tsx (2)
48-55: Great improvement using limel-code-editor instead of textareaReplacing the textarea with a code editor provides a better user experience for editing JSON, with features like syntax highlighting, line numbers, linting, and code folding.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 48-55: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
72-82:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify handling of
event.target.valuewith limel-code-editorThe code editor component might emit events with a different structure than a standard textarea. Please verify that
event.target.valuestill correctly accesses the edited content.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other usages of limel-code-editor to see how the onChange event is typically handled rg --type ts "limel-code-editor.*onChange" # Also search for the implementation of limel-code-editor to understand its event structure fd -e ts -e tsx "code-editor" src/components/Length of output: 432
Action: Confirm correct event property for limel-code-editor events
At
src/components/form/examples/dynamic-form.tsx(lines 72–82), thehandleTextChangemethod currently accesses the edited content viaevent.target.value. Since thelimel-code-editorcomponent may emit a custom event structure—potentially using a property likeevent.detailinstead of the conventionaltarget.value—please verify that the current usage correctly retrieves the updated content. If the event structure deviates from that of a standard textarea, update the handler accordingly to ensure the proper value is captured.
| <limel-code-editor | ||
| language="json" | ||
| lineNumbers={true} | ||
| lint={true} | ||
| fold={true} | ||
| onChange={this.handleTextChange} | ||
| value={this.text} | ||
| />, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add key prop to elements in the render array
Each element in an array should have a unique "key" prop to help React efficiently update the DOM.
<limel-code-editor
+ key="editor"
language="json"
lineNumbers={true}
lint={true}
fold={true}
onChange={this.handleTextChange}
value={this.text}
/>,This applies to all elements in the returned array. The static analysis tool correctly flagged this issue.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <limel-code-editor | |
| language="json" | |
| lineNumbers={true} | |
| lint={true} | |
| fold={true} | |
| onChange={this.handleTextChange} | |
| value={this.text} | |
| />, | |
| <limel-code-editor | |
| key="editor" | |
| language="json" | |
| lineNumbers={true} | |
| lint={true} | |
| fold={true} | |
| onChange={this.handleTextChange} | |
| value={this.text} | |
| />, |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 48-55: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Haha, funny. In the first review, Biome detected this, but CodeRabbit suppressed it as a false positive, because the array is never modified. This time around, it instead expressed that "The static analysis tool correctly flagged this issue." 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@adrianschmidt You caught me! That's definitely an inconsistency on my part. You're right - the array is static and never reordered, so while React technically recommends keys for all array elements, it's much less critical in this scenario. The first review had the more appropriate assessment. I'll make sure to be more consistent about this specific linting rule going forward. Thanks for pointing this out! 😄
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: adrianschmidt
PR: Lundalogik/lime-elements#3199
File: src/components/form/examples/dynamic-form.tsx:48-55
Timestamp: 2025-03-02T16:12:55.428Z
Learning: For JSX arrays that are static (never reordered or modified), missing key props are a low-priority issue that can be reasonably suppressed as a false positive, even though React documentation recommends keys for all elements in arrays. This applies to components like the one in src/components/form/examples/dynamic-form.tsx where the render method returns a fixed array of elements.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
fix: #1859
Review:
Browsers tested:
(Check any that applies, it's ok to leave boxes unchecked if testing something didn't seem relevant.)
Windows:
Linux:
macOS:
Mobile:
Summary by CodeRabbit