Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Documentation on Token usage to Bypass CSRF in Readme.md #153

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Added Documentation on Token usage to Bypass CSRF in Readme.md #153

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

harshitkumargupta
Copy link

@harshitkumargupta harshitkumargupta commented Oct 6, 2024

No description provided.

Added Documentation on Token usage to Bypass CSRF
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Oct 6, 2024

@ildyria
Copy link
Member

ildyria commented Oct 6, 2024

That is absolutely completely missing the point.

  1. All that is written here is already assumed knowledge when using CSRF protection.
  2. This wall of text is pure chat gpt generated.
  3. This text is about using the CSRF protection, the issue Add documentation on token usage to bypass CSRF. #68 is about how to use the User-generated API token to bypass the actual protection.
  4. This is at the wrong place and should not be placed in the README. This repo is the source of our website, and we have literally a dedicated folder where all the documentation goes.

Closing.

@ildyria ildyria closed this Oct 6, 2024
@harshitkumargupta harshitkumargupta deleted the Documentation-on-token-usage-to-bypass-CSRF branch October 6, 2024 07:14
@harshitkumargupta harshitkumargupta restored the Documentation-on-token-usage-to-bypass-CSRF branch October 6, 2024 07:14
@harshitkumargupta harshitkumargupta deleted the Documentation-on-token-usage-to-bypass-CSRF branch October 6, 2024 07:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants