-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
Proposal: Add Field to MalwareSubjectType to Capture Static Features
Status: CLOSED
Comment Period Closes: September 24th, 2015
Affects Backwards Compatibility: No
Relevant Issue: https://github.com/MAECProject/schemas/issues/110
Currently, static features of a malware instance are captured by defining Objects in a MAEC Bundle. This method has proven to be awkward and indirect.
This proposal is related to the following proposed changes to the schema: https://github.com/MAECProject/schemas/wiki/Proposal:-Deprecate-MAEC-Bundle
https://github.com/MAECProject/schemas/wiki/Proposal:-Make-Objects-Top-level-Entities
To tie static features more directly to a malware instance, we propose the addition of a Static_Features field to MalwareSubjectType
:
Field | Type | Multiplicity | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Static_Features | ObjectReferenceListType |
0-1 | The Static_Features field specifies a set of one or more Object references related to the malware instance characterized by the Malware Subject. |
The Static_Features field will allow multiple, specific static analysis results to be linked to a single Malware Subject. For example, when a malware instance is analyzed, one Object could be created for the output of the PEFile tool, and a second Object could be created for the output of a string-dumping tool. Then both Objects could be referenced as static features of the malware instance (which is characterized by the Malware Subject).
<Objects>
<Object id="object_1">
<Properties xsi:type="WinExecutableFileObj:WindowsExecutableFileObjectType">
<Headers>
<Optional_Header>
<Major_Linker_Version>06</Major_Linker_Version>
<Minor_Linker_Version>00</Minor_Linker_Version>
<Base_Of_Code>036418</Base_Of_Code>
<Subsystem>Windows_GUI</Subsystem>
</Optional_Header>
</Headers>
<Type>Executable</Type>
</Properties>
</Object>
<Object id="object_2">
<Properties xsi:type="WinExecutableFileObj:WindowsExecutableFileObjectType">
<Size_In_Bytes>24840</Size_In_Bytes>
<Hashes>
<Hash>
<Type xsi:type="cyboxVocabs:HashNameVocab-1.0">MD5</Type>
<Simple_Hash_Value>3d23ec8b55840b95ea75197ce9446b6d</Simple_Hash_Value>
</Hash>
<Hash>
<Type xsi:type="cyboxVocabs:HashNameVocab-1.0">SHA1</Type>
<Simple_Hash_Value>272ce73adebba81983abbbf112155e463951d046</Simple_Hash_Value>
</Hash>
<Hashes>
</Properties>
</Object>
</Objects>
<Malware_Subjects>
<Malware_Subject>
<Static_Features>
<Object_Reference object_id="object_1"/>
<Object_Reference object_id="object_2"/>
</Static_Features>
</Malware_Subject>
</Malware_Subjects>
This change will not be backward compatible and is one of several revisions planned in the new major version.
- Should static features of a malware instance be captured in a Malware Subject field?
- Are there preferable ways to easily capture static features?