-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 720
fix inclusion of PRO in secondary structure #5065
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
- fix #4913 - ported fix from PyDSSP 0.9.1 by @ShintaroMinami to analysis.dssp.DSSP (see also ShintaroMinami/PyDSSP#2) - new kwarg ignore_proline_donor=True for DSSP (the new default changes the behavior and implements the fix, False recovers old behavior); the kwarg also exists in PyDSSP - updated docs - minimal regression tests - updated CHANGELOG
b38e9db
to
005100f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a quick draft. I'd be more than happy if someone continued and completed it.
self._donor_mask: Optional[np.ndarray] = ( | ||
ag.residues.resnames != "PRO" if ignore_proline_donor else None | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This may not be correct. The code runs ... but I am not sure if I should be masking corresponding atoms.
Mask out any hydrogens that should not be considered (in particular HN | ||
in PRO). If ``None`` then all H will be used (behavior up to 2.9.0). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These docs should be more specific and state the shape. I just quickly guessed the shape from https://github.com/ShintaroMinami/PyDSSP/blob/e251a43ff8622fe0a555313b1567edce45e789e8/scripts/pydssp#L30
donor_mask = sequence != 'PRO' if args.ignore_proline_donor else None
if donor_mask is not None | ||
else np.ones(n_atoms, dtype=float) | ||
) | ||
donor_mask = np.tile(donor_mask[:, np.newaxis], (1, n_atoms)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the donor_mask (one element for each residue) really correct for this tiling????
# hydrogen bond map (continuous value extension of original definition) | ||
hbond_map = np.clip(cutoff - margin - e, a_min=-margin, a_max=margin) | ||
hbond_map = (np.sin(hbond_map / margin * np.pi / 2) + 1.0) / 2 | ||
hbond_map = hbond_map * local_mask | ||
hbond_map *= local_mask | ||
hbond_map *= donor_mask |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this correct? The original code uses https://github.com/ShintaroMinami/PyDSSP/blob/e251a43ff8622fe0a555313b1567edce45e789e8/pydssp/pydssp_numpy.py#L72
hbond_map = hbond_map * repeat(donor_mask, 'l1 l2 -> b l1 l2', b=b)
(with einops.repeat()
). Note that we create our donor_mask
with tile
so it may already be the right size and shape.
@@ -13,15 +13,52 @@ | |||
"pdb_filename", glob.glob(f"{DSSP_FOLDER}/?????.pdb.gz") | |||
) | |||
def test_file_guess_hydrogens(pdb_filename, client_DSSP): | |||
# run 2.9.0 tests (which include PRO) | |||
# ignore_proline_donor=False | |||
# TODO: update reference data for ignore_proline_donor=True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should really have correct reference data. About half of the files do not show a difference between ignore_proline_donor=True
and ignore_proline_donor=False
.
protein = mda.Universe(TPR, XTC).select_atoms("protein") | ||
run = DSSP(protein).run(**client_DSSP, stop=10) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These lines seemed superfluous as the atomgroup approach is tested separately.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #5065 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 93.63% 93.63%
========================================
Files 177 177
Lines 22033 22037 +4
Branches 3115 3115
========================================
+ Hits 20631 20635 +4
Misses 948 948
Partials 454 454 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Fixes #4913
Changes made in this Pull Request:
PR Checklist
package/CHANGELOG
file updated?package/AUTHORS
? (If it is not, add it!)Developers Certificate of Origin
I certify that I can submit this code contribution as described in the Developer Certificate of Origin, under the MDAnalysis LICENSE.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://mdanalysis--5065.org.readthedocs.build/en/5065/