Initial implementation of metadata in flow info.

[davidwaroquiers]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 93.02326% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 74.08%. Comparing base (6185224) to head (77a1542).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/jobflow_remote/cli/utils.py	77.77%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
src/jobflow_remote/cli/formatting.py	92.30%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #366      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    74.03%   74.08%   +0.04%     
===========================================
  Files           51       51              
  Lines         7430     7446      +16     
  Branches      1207     1209       +2     
===========================================
+ Hits          5501     5516      +15     
  Misses        1516     1516              
- Partials       413      414       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
all_local_tests	73.86% <93.02%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
all_tests	74.08% <93.02%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
db_tests	69.88% <90.69%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
integration_local_tests	47.73% <23.25%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
integration_remote_tests	26.60% <20.93%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
integration_tests	48.68% <23.25%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
unit_tests	26.83% <20.93%> (+0.03%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/jobflow_remote/cli/flow.py	73.10% <100.00%> (+0.96%)	⬆️
src/jobflow_remote/cli/job.py	84.31% <100.00%> (+0.39%)	⬆️
src/jobflow_remote/cli/types.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/jobflow_remote/jobs/daemon.py	67.68% <100.00%> (ø)
src/jobflow_remote/jobs/data.py	90.19% <100.00%> (+0.15%)	⬆️
src/jobflow_remote/jobs/jobcontroller.py	79.97% <100.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
src/jobflow_remote/cli/formatting.py	84.15% <92.30%> (-0.16%)	⬇️
src/jobflow_remote/cli/utils.py	64.51% <77.77%> (+0.35%)	⬆️

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[gpetretto]

Nice!
Here are my initial comments.

[davidwaroquiers]

Ok, I've made a few changes (still work in progress, up for discussion)

[gpetretto]

It is fine with me. Just left to decide what to do about the shortening of the metadata.

Also maybe add a check on the metadata in the tests?

[davidwaroquiers]

Done