Added the possibility to have a custom scheduler io

[davidwaroquiers]

The scheduler_type option config can now take a str (which is then directly converted to an existing qtoolkit scheduler io) or a dict based representation of a class.
Added the tests.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 78.94737% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 74.15%. Comparing base (73a1bbf) to head (41562cc).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/jobflow_remote/config/base.py	75.00%	3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (78.94%) is below the target coverage (100.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.
❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (27.00%) is below the target coverage (50.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #383      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    74.08%   74.15%   +0.07%     
===========================================
  Files           51       51              
  Lines         7446     7459      +13     
  Branches      1209     1212       +3     
===========================================
+ Hits          5516     5531      +15     
+ Misses        1516     1514       -2     
  Partials       414      414              

Flag	Coverage Δ
all_local_tests	73.93% <78.94%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
all_tests	74.15% <78.94%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
db_tests	69.87% <36.84%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
integration_local_tests	47.72% <36.84%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
integration_remote_tests	26.61% <31.57%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
integration_tests	48.67% <36.84%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unit_tests	27.00% <78.94%> (+0.16%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/jobflow_remote/testing/__init__.py	94.18% <100.00%> (+0.21%)	⬆️
src/jobflow_remote/config/base.py	83.83% <75.00%> (+0.63%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[gpetretto]

Looks good to me, but I don't see the tests. Maybe they were not committed?
Also, it seems it contains the changes related to the flow info, so maybe better merge the other first?

[davidwaroquiers]

Looks good to me, but I don't see the tests. Maybe they were not committed? Also, it seems it contains the changes related to the flow info, so maybe better merge the other first?

Duh, I forgot to commit the test indeed. Now it's done. For the flow info I don't know why ... maybe I started the branch from the flow info (I thought I had done it from develop but probably not ...). Let's wait for the merge of flow info then I'll merge it back here and push.

[gpetretto]

I see that the unit test is failing. Indeed I think that inside the model_validator it should raise a ValueError:
https://docs.pydantic.dev/latest/concepts/validators/#raising-validation-errors