-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Ensure coordinator fallback preserves access when API is down #191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@MrIbrahem has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 1 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @MrIbrahem, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the system's resilience by improving how coordinator access is managed, particularly during API outages. It introduces logic to normalize coordinator data fetched from SQL, ensuring that all records have an 'active' status, preventing unintended access restrictions. A new helper function centralizes the creation of an active status index, and comprehensive unit tests have been added to validate this critical fallback behavior. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request effectively addresses an issue with the SQL fallback for coordinator data by ensuring the active flag is always present, mirroring the API's behavior. The introduction of the normalize_coordinator_rows and coordinator_active_index helper functions is a good approach, and they are well-covered by unit tests. My review includes a couple of suggestions to improve efficiency by avoiding redundant data normalization and to enhance code clarity in the new helper functions.
| // consumers. The SQL fallback currently only returns the `id` and | ||
| // `user` columns, so we inject a default active=1 flag in that case to | ||
| // match the API payload. | ||
| $u_data = normalize_coordinator_rows($u_data); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The get_coordinator function now normalizes the data, and coordinator_active_index also normalizes the data. When called as coordinator_active_index(get_coordinator()) in src/header.php, the data is normalized twice. While this is not incorrect, it is inefficient. Consider removing the normalization from one of the functions to avoid redundant work. A good approach might be to remove this line and let coordinator_active_index be responsible for normalization, which aligns with its test case and its role as a 'reusable helper'.
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| $coordinators[$user] = (int) ($row['active'] ?? 0); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since normalize_coordinator_rows is called at the beginning of this function, the active key is guaranteed to exist and be an integer for every array row. Therefore, the null coalescing operator (?? 0) and the (int) cast are redundant. The ?? 0 is also confusing as it suggests a default of 0, while normalize_coordinator_rows provides a default of 1 for missing active keys.
$coordinators[$user] = $row['active'];
Summary
Testing
bash run_tests.sh(fails: vendor/bin/phpunit: No such file or directory)https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_69086eec0c088322a0b6f5f351b28088