-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 252
fix: shield coverage result polling #6847
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 5 commits
eb2666b
0ce87d5
7b18fd5
2fe24ea
a2a9f78
9225267
9119e4a
bfa117c
affbbcf
565c42c
a1d580c
19e8a3e
588dd38
7ed65c0
a5295ab
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ import type { | |
} from '@metamask/base-controller'; | ||
import { | ||
SignatureRequestStatus, | ||
SignatureRequestType, | ||
type SignatureRequest, | ||
type SignatureStateChange, | ||
} from '@metamask/signature-controller'; | ||
|
@@ -236,10 +235,7 @@ export class ShieldController extends BaseController< | |
|
||
// Check coverage if the signature request is new and has type | ||
// `personal_sign`. | ||
if ( | ||
!previousSignatureRequest && | ||
signatureRequest.type === SignatureRequestType.PersonalSign | ||
) { | ||
if (!previousSignatureRequest) { | ||
this.checkSignatureCoverage(signatureRequest).catch( | ||
// istanbul ignore next | ||
(error) => log('Error checking coverage:', error), | ||
|
@@ -268,15 +264,15 @@ export class ShieldController extends BaseController< | |
); | ||
for (const transaction of transactions) { | ||
const previousTransaction = previousTransactionsById.get(transaction.id); | ||
// Check if the simulation data has changed. | ||
const simulationDataChanged = this.#compareTransactionSimulationData( | ||
transaction.simulationData, | ||
previousTransaction?.simulationData, | ||
); | ||
|
||
// Check coverage if the transaction is new or if the simulation data has | ||
// changed. | ||
if ( | ||
!previousTransaction || | ||
// Checking reference equality is sufficient because this object is | ||
// replaced if the simulation data has changed. | ||
previousTransaction.simulationData !== transaction.simulationData | ||
) { | ||
if (!previousTransaction || simulationDataChanged) { | ||
this.checkCoverage(transaction).catch( | ||
// istanbul ignore next | ||
(error) => log('Error checking coverage:', error), | ||
|
@@ -443,4 +439,61 @@ export class ShieldController extends BaseController< | |
#getLatestCoverageId(itemId: string): string | undefined { | ||
return this.state.coverageResults[itemId]?.results[0]?.coverageId; | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Compares the simulation data of a transaction. | ||
* | ||
* @param simulationData - The simulation data of the transaction. | ||
* @param previousSimulationData - The previous simulation data of the transaction. | ||
* @returns Whether the simulation data has changed. | ||
*/ | ||
#compareTransactionSimulationData( | ||
simulationData?: TransactionMeta['simulationData'], | ||
previousSimulationData?: TransactionMeta['simulationData'], | ||
) { | ||
if (!simulationData && !previousSimulationData) { | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// check the simulation error | ||
if ( | ||
simulationData?.error?.code !== previousSimulationData?.error?.code || | ||
simulationData?.error?.message !== previousSimulationData?.error?.message | ||
) { | ||
return true; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// check the native balance change | ||
if ( | ||
simulationData?.nativeBalanceChange?.difference !== | ||
previousSimulationData?.nativeBalanceChange?.difference || | ||
simulationData?.nativeBalanceChange?.newBalance !== | ||
previousSimulationData?.nativeBalanceChange?.newBalance || | ||
simulationData?.nativeBalanceChange?.previousBalance !== | ||
previousSimulationData?.nativeBalanceChange?.previousBalance || | ||
simulationData?.nativeBalanceChange?.isDecrease !== | ||
previousSimulationData?.nativeBalanceChange?.isDecrease | ||
) { | ||
return true; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// check the token balance changes | ||
if ( | ||
simulationData?.tokenBalanceChanges?.length !== | ||
previousSimulationData?.tokenBalanceChanges?.length || | ||
simulationData?.tokenBalanceChanges?.some( | ||
(tokenBalanceChange, index) => | ||
tokenBalanceChange.difference !== | ||
previousSimulationData?.tokenBalanceChanges?.[index]?.difference, | ||
) | ||
) { | ||
return true; | ||
} | ||
lwin-kyaw marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Bug: Undefined Token Balances Cause TypeErrorThe There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
||
// check the isUpdatedAfterSecurityCheck | ||
return ( | ||
simulationData?.isUpdatedAfterSecurityCheck !== | ||
previousSimulationData?.isUpdatedAfterSecurityCheck | ||
); | ||
} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Bug: Transaction Simulation Data Comparison FailsThe |
||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bug: Transaction Simulation Data Comparison Reversed
The call to
#compareTransactionSimulationData
passespreviousTransaction?.simulationData
as the currentsimulationData
andtransaction.simulationData
as the previouspreviousSimulationData
. This reverses the comparison logic, leading to incorrect change detection for transaction simulation data and potentially triggering unnecessary coverage checks.Additional Locations (1)
packages/shield-controller/src/ShieldController.ts#L457-L461
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bot must have had a bad day. That's not the case, as far as I can see.